2005 Hanse 312 vs Hunter 31 — Comparison

2005 Hanse 312
VS
Hunter 31Hunter 31

Specifications Side by Side

Specification2005 Hanse 312Hunter 31
General
ManufacturerHanseHunter
Year2005–20082000–2005
TypeSloopSloop
CountryGermanyUSA
DesignerJudel/VrolijkGlenn Henderson
Dimensions
LOA9.55 m (31.3 ft)9.45 m (31.0 ft)
LWL8.50 m (27.9 ft)8.23 m (27.0 ft)
Beam3.25 m (10.7 ft)3.12 m (10.2 ft)
Draft1.75 m (5.7 ft)1.68 m (5.5 ft)
Weight
Displacement4,300 kg (9,480 lbs)4,082 kg (8,999 lbs)
Ballast1,400 kg (3,086 lbs)1,588 kg (3,501 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area47.0 m² (506 ft²)44.0 m² (474 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine18 HP18 HP
Fuel Capacity55 L (14.5 gal)57 L (15.1 gal)
Water Capacity100 L (26.4 gal)114 L (30.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths56
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
2005 Hanse 312
18.06
Hunter 31
17.51
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
2005 Hanse 312
32.56
Hunter 31
38.90
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
2005 Hanse 312
0.80
Hunter 31
0.78
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
2005 Hanse 312
17.69
Hunter 31
18.65

Detailed Comparison

The 2005 Hanse 312 and Hunter 31 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 2005 Hanse 312 is a 2000s design by Hanse from Germany, while the Hunter 31 is a 2000s offering from Hunter from USA. The 2005 Hanse 312 was penned by Judel/Vrolijk. The Hunter 31 was designed by Glenn Henderson.

In terms of size, the 2005 Hanse 312 measures 9.55m (31.3ft) overall with a beam of 3.25m, compared to the Hunter 31 at 9.45m (31.0ft) with a 3.12m beam. The 2005 Hanse 312 is 0.10m longer than the Hunter 31. The 2005 Hanse 312 displaces approximately 5% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 2005 Hanse 312 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 18.06 and 47.0 m² of sail area. The Hunter 31, with an SA/D of 17.51 and 44.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The 2005 Hanse 312 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 2005 Hanse 312 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 17.7) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.80). The Hunter 31 has a comfort ratio of 18.7 and a capsize screening value of 0.78. The ballast ratios are 32.6% for the 2005 Hanse 312 and 38.9% for the Hunter 31, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 2005 Hanse 312 provides 5 berths in 2 cabins with 100L of water capacity and 55L of fuel. The Hunter 31 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L water and 57L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The Hunter 31 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2005 Hanse 312 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The Hunter 31 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 2005 Hanse 312 · Hunter 31