Hanse 320 vs 1974 Morgan 33 — Comparison

Hanse 320 Hanse 320
VS
1974 Morgan 33 1974 Morgan 33

Specifications Side by Side

Specification Hanse 320 1974 Morgan 33
General
Manufacturer Hanse Morgan
Year 2005–2010 1974–1980
Type Sloop Sloop
Country Germany USA
Designer judel/vrolijk & co Charlie Morgan
Dimensions
LOA 9.92 m (32.5 ft) 10.06 m (33.0 ft)
LWL 8.80 m (28.9 ft) 8.23 m (27.0 ft)
Beam 3.28 m (10.8 ft) 3.20 m (10.5 ft)
Draft 1.70 m (5.6 ft) 1.37 m (4.5 ft)
Weight
Displacement 4,600 kg (10,141 lbs) 5,216 kg (11,499 lbs)
Ballast 1,400 kg (3,086 lbs) 2,041 kg (4,500 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area 46.0 m² (495 ft²) 42.0 m² (452 ft²)
Hull Material Fiberglass Fiberglass
Keel Type Fin Fin
Engine & Tanks
Engine 18 HP 18 HP
Fuel Capacity 90 L (23.8 gal) 76 L (20.1 gal)
Water Capacity 150 L (39.6 gal) 114 L (30.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths 6 6
Cabins 2 2

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
Hanse 320
16.90
1974 Morgan 33
14.19
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
Hanse 320
30.43
1974 Morgan 33
39.13
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
Hanse 320
0.79
1974 Morgan 33
0.74
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
Hanse 320
17.40
1974 Morgan 33
22.09

Detailed Comparison

The Hanse 320 and 1974 Morgan 33 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The Hanse 320 is a 2000s design by Hanse from Germany, while the 1974 Morgan 33 is a 1970s offering from Morgan from USA. The Hanse 320 was penned by judel/vrolijk & co. The 1974 Morgan 33 was designed by Charlie Morgan.

In terms of size, the Hanse 320 measures 9.92m (32.5ft) overall with a beam of 3.28m, compared to the 1974 Morgan 33 at 10.06m (33.0ft) with a 3.20m beam. The 1974 Morgan 33 is 0.14m longer than the Hanse 320. The 1974 Morgan 33 displaces approximately 13% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the Hanse 320 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.90 and 46.0 m² of sail area. The 1974 Morgan 33, with an SA/D of 14.19 and 42.0 m² of canvas, offers modest sail power for its displacement. The Hanse 320 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the Hanse 320 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 17.4) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.79). The 1974 Morgan 33 has a comfort ratio of 22.1 and a capsize screening value of 0.74. The ballast ratios are 30.4% for the Hanse 320 and 39.1% for the 1974 Morgan 33, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the Hanse 320 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 150L of water capacity and 90L of fuel. The 1974 Morgan 33 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L water and 76L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1974 Morgan 33 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Hanse 320 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

VS