Hanse 320 vs 1984 Cape Dory 33 — Comparison

Hanse 320 Hanse 320
VS
1984 Cape Dory 33 1984 Cape Dory 33

Specifications Side by Side

Specification Hanse 320 1984 Cape Dory 33
General
Manufacturer Hanse Cape Dory
Year 2005–2010 1984–1990
Type Sloop Sloop
Country Germany USA
Designer judel/vrolijk & co Carl Alberg
Dimensions
LOA 9.92 m (32.5 ft) 10.06 m (33.0 ft)
LWL 8.80 m (28.9 ft) 7.92 m (26.0 ft)
Beam 3.28 m (10.8 ft) 3.12 m (10.2 ft)
Draft 1.70 m (5.6 ft) 1.45 m (4.8 ft)
Weight
Displacement 4,600 kg (10,141 lbs) 4,990 kg (11,001 lbs)
Ballast 1,400 kg (3,086 lbs) 2,177 kg (4,799 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area 46.0 m² (495 ft²) 44.0 m² (474 ft²)
Hull Material Fiberglass Fiberglass
Keel Type Fin Full
Engine & Tanks
Engine 18 HP 22 HP
Fuel Capacity 90 L (23.8 gal) 76 L (20.1 gal)
Water Capacity 150 L (39.6 gal) 151 L (39.9 gal)
Accommodation
Berths 6 5
Cabins 2 2

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
Hanse 320
16.90
1984 Cape Dory 33
15.31
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
Hanse 320
30.43
1984 Cape Dory 33
43.63
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
Hanse 320
0.79
1984 Cape Dory 33
0.73
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
Hanse 320
17.40
1984 Cape Dory 33
22.98

Detailed Comparison

The Hanse 320 and 1984 Cape Dory 33 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The Hanse 320 is a 2000s design by Hanse from Germany, while the 1984 Cape Dory 33 is a 1980s offering from Cape Dory from USA. The Hanse 320 was penned by judel/vrolijk & co. The 1984 Cape Dory 33 was designed by Carl Alberg.

In terms of size, the Hanse 320 measures 9.92m (32.5ft) overall with a beam of 3.28m, compared to the 1984 Cape Dory 33 at 10.06m (33.0ft) with a 3.12m beam. The 1984 Cape Dory 33 is 0.14m longer than the Hanse 320. The 1984 Cape Dory 33 displaces approximately 8% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the Hanse 320 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.90 and 46.0 m² of sail area. The 1984 Cape Dory 33, with an SA/D of 15.31 and 44.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The Hanse 320 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the Hanse 320 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 17.4) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.79). The 1984 Cape Dory 33 has a comfort ratio of 23.0 and a capsize screening value of 0.73. The ballast ratios are 30.4% for the Hanse 320 and 43.6% for the 1984 Cape Dory 33, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the Hanse 320 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 150L of water capacity and 90L of fuel. The 1984 Cape Dory 33 offers 5 berths in 2 cabins with 151L water and 76L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1984 Cape Dory 33 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Hanse 320 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The Hanse 320 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

VS