Catalina 385 vs 1982 Westerly Konsort — Comparison

Catalina 385
VS
1982 Westerly Konsort1982 Westerly Konsort

Specifications Side by Side

SpecificationCatalina 3851982 Westerly Konsort
General
ManufacturerCatalinaWesterly
Year2006–20141982–1990
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAUK
DesignerGerry DouglasEd Dubois
Dimensions
LOA11.73 m (38.5 ft)9.50 m (31.2 ft)
LWL10.21 m (33.5 ft)7.70 m (25.3 ft)
Beam3.76 m (12.3 ft)3.10 m (10.2 ft)
Draft2.06 m (6.8 ft)1.07 m (3.5 ft)
Weight
Displacement8,165 kg (18,001 lbs)4,536 kg (10,000 lbs)
Ballast3,175 kg (7,000 lbs)1,633 kg (3,600 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area65.0 m² (700 ft²)34.0 m² (366 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinBilge
Engine & Tanks
Engine35 HP15 HP
Fuel Capacity114 L (30.1 gal)68 L (18.0 gal)
Water Capacity242 L (63.9 gal)114 L (30.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths76
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
Catalina 385
16.29
1982 Westerly Konsort
12.61
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
Catalina 385
38.89
1982 Westerly Konsort
36.00
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
Catalina 385
0.75
1982 Westerly Konsort
0.75
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
Catalina 385
18.89
1982 Westerly Konsort
22.75

Detailed Comparison

The Catalina 385 and 1982 Westerly Konsort represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The Catalina 385 is a 2000s design by Catalina from USA, while the 1982 Westerly Konsort is a 1980s offering from Westerly from UK. The Catalina 385 was penned by Gerry Douglas. The 1982 Westerly Konsort was designed by Ed Dubois.

In terms of size, the Catalina 385 measures 11.73m (38.5ft) overall with a beam of 3.76m, compared to the 1982 Westerly Konsort at 9.50m (31.2ft) with a 3.10m beam. The Catalina 385 is 2.23m longer than the 1982 Westerly Konsort. The Catalina 385 displaces approximately 80% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the Catalina 385 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.29 and 65.0 m² of sail area. The 1982 Westerly Konsort, with an SA/D of 12.61 and 34.0 m² of canvas, offers modest sail power for its displacement. The Catalina 385 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the Catalina 385 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 18.9) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.75). The 1982 Westerly Konsort has a comfort ratio of 22.8 and a capsize screening value of 0.75. The ballast ratios are 38.9% for the Catalina 385 and 36.0% for the 1982 Westerly Konsort, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the Catalina 385 provides 7 berths in 2 cabins with 242L of water capacity and 114L of fuel. The 1982 Westerly Konsort offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L water and 68L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1982 Westerly Konsort is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Catalina 385 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The Catalina 385 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: Catalina 385 · 1982 Westerly Konsort