Hanse 342 vs 1984 O'Day 30 — Comparison

Hanse 342Hanse 342
VS
1984 O'Day 30

Specifications Side by Side

SpecificationHanse 3421984 O'Day 30
General
ManufacturerHanseO'Day
Year2006–20101984–1989
TypeSloopSloop
CountryGermanyUSA
Designerjudel/vrolijk & coC. Raymond Hunt
Dimensions
LOA10.30 m (33.8 ft)9.14 m (30.0 ft)
LWL9.20 m (30.2 ft)7.62 m (25.0 ft)
Beam3.40 m (11.2 ft)3.05 m (10.0 ft)
Draft1.80 m (5.9 ft)1.52 m (5.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement5,300 kg (11,684 lbs)3,629 kg (8,001 lbs)
Ballast1,650 kg (3,638 lbs)1,452 kg (3,201 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area52.0 m² (560 ft²)36.0 m² (388 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine21 HP13 HP
Fuel Capacity100 L (26.4 gal)57 L (15.1 gal)
Water Capacity180 L (47.6 gal)76 L (20.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths66
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
Hanse 342
17.38
1984 O'Day 30
15.49
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
Hanse 342
31.13
1984 O'Day 30
40.01
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
Hanse 342
0.78
1984 O'Day 30
0.79
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
Hanse 342
17.57
1984 O'Day 30
19.36

Detailed Comparison

The Hanse 342 and 1984 O'Day 30 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The Hanse 342 is a 2000s design by Hanse from Germany, while the 1984 O'Day 30 is a 1980s offering from O'Day from USA. The Hanse 342 was penned by judel/vrolijk & co. The 1984 O'Day 30 was designed by C. Raymond Hunt.

In terms of size, the Hanse 342 measures 10.30m (33.8ft) overall with a beam of 3.40m, compared to the 1984 O'Day 30 at 9.14m (30.0ft) with a 3.05m beam. The Hanse 342 is 1.16m longer than the 1984 O'Day 30. The Hanse 342 displaces approximately 46% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the Hanse 342 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.38 and 52.0 m² of sail area. The 1984 O'Day 30, with an SA/D of 15.49 and 36.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The Hanse 342 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the Hanse 342 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 17.6) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.78). The 1984 O'Day 30 has a comfort ratio of 19.4 and a capsize screening value of 0.79. The ballast ratios are 31.1% for the Hanse 342 and 40.0% for the 1984 O'Day 30, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the Hanse 342 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 180L of water capacity and 100L of fuel. The 1984 O'Day 30 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 76L water and 57L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1984 O'Day 30 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Hanse 342 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: Hanse 342 · 1984 O'Day 30