2008 Catalina 350 vs Hunter 36 — Comparison

2008 Catalina 350
VS
Hunter 36Hunter 36

Specifications Side by Side

Specification2008 Catalina 350Hunter 36
General
ManufacturerCatalinaHunter
Year2008–20121996–2001
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAUSA
DesignerGerry DouglasGlenn Henderson
Dimensions
LOA10.67 m (35.0 ft)10.82 m (35.5 ft)
LWL9.45 m (31.0 ft)9.45 m (31.0 ft)
Beam3.65 m (12.0 ft)3.56 m (11.7 ft)
Draft1.52 m (5.0 ft)1.83 m (6.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement6,577 kg (14,500 lbs)5,897 kg (13,001 lbs)
Ballast2,495 kg (5,501 lbs)2,313 kg (5,099 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area55.3 m² (595 ft²)56.0 m² (603 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine22 HP27 HP
Fuel Capacity114 L (30.1 gal)95 L (25.1 gal)
Water Capacity189 L (49.9 gal)170 L (44.9 gal)
Accommodation
Berths76
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
2008 Catalina 350
16.01
Hunter 36
17.43
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
2008 Catalina 350
37.94
Hunter 36
39.22
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
2008 Catalina 350
0.78
Hunter 36
0.79
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
2008 Catalina 350
18.69
Hunter 36
17.17

Detailed Comparison

The 2008 Catalina 350 and Hunter 36 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 2008 Catalina 350 is a 2000s design by Catalina from USA, while the Hunter 36 is a 1990s offering from Hunter from USA. The 2008 Catalina 350 was penned by Gerry Douglas. The Hunter 36 was designed by Glenn Henderson.

In terms of size, the 2008 Catalina 350 measures 10.67m (35.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.65m, compared to the Hunter 36 at 10.82m (35.5ft) with a 3.56m beam. The Hunter 36 is 0.15m longer than the 2008 Catalina 350. The 2008 Catalina 350 displaces approximately 12% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 2008 Catalina 350 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.01 and 55.3 m² of sail area. The Hunter 36, with an SA/D of 17.43 and 56.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The Hunter 36 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 2008 Catalina 350 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 18.7) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.78). The Hunter 36 has a comfort ratio of 17.2 and a capsize screening value of 0.79. The ballast ratios are 37.9% for the 2008 Catalina 350 and 39.2% for the Hunter 36, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 2008 Catalina 350 provides 7 berths in 2 cabins with 189L of water capacity and 114L of fuel. The Hunter 36 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 170L water and 95L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 2008 Catalina 350 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Hunter 36 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 2008 Catalina 350 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 2008 Catalina 350 · Hunter 36