2010 Beneteau Oceanis 43 vs 2000 Sabre 386 — Comparison

2010 Beneteau Oceanis 432010 Beneteau Oceanis 43
VS
2000 Sabre 386

Specifications Side by Side

Specification2010 Beneteau Oceanis 432000 Sabre 386
General
ManufacturerBeneteauSabre
Year2010–20142000–2007
TypeSloopSloop
CountryFranceUSA
DesignerGroupe Finot-ConqJim Taylor
Dimensions
LOA13.17 m (43.2 ft)11.58 m (38.0 ft)
LWL11.60 m (38.1 ft)9.75 m (32.0 ft)
Beam4.17 m (13.7 ft)3.56 m (11.7 ft)
Draft2.10 m (6.9 ft)1.75 m (5.7 ft)
Weight
Displacement9,500 kg (20,944 lbs)7,257 kg (15,999 lbs)
Ballast3,000 kg (6,614 lbs)2,948 kg (6,499 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area80.0 m² (861 ft²)60.5 m² (651 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine54 HP35 HP
Fuel Capacity150 L (39.6 gal)114 L (30.1 gal)
Water Capacity300 L (79.3 gal)189 L (49.9 gal)
Accommodation
Berths87
Cabins32

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
2010 Beneteau Oceanis 43
18.12
2000 Sabre 386
16.40
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
2010 Beneteau Oceanis 43
31.58
2000 Sabre 386
40.62
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
2010 Beneteau Oceanis 43
0.79
2000 Sabre 386
0.74
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
2010 Beneteau Oceanis 43
14.95
2000 Sabre 386
19.37

Detailed Comparison

The 2010 Beneteau Oceanis 43 and 2000 Sabre 386 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 2010 Beneteau Oceanis 43 is a modern design by Beneteau from France, while the 2000 Sabre 386 is a 2000s offering from Sabre from USA. The 2010 Beneteau Oceanis 43 was penned by Groupe Finot-Conq. The 2000 Sabre 386 was designed by Jim Taylor.

In terms of size, the 2010 Beneteau Oceanis 43 measures 13.17m (43.2ft) overall with a beam of 4.17m, compared to the 2000 Sabre 386 at 11.58m (38.0ft) with a 3.56m beam. The 2010 Beneteau Oceanis 43 is 1.59m longer than the 2000 Sabre 386. The 2010 Beneteau Oceanis 43 displaces approximately 31% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 2010 Beneteau Oceanis 43 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 18.12 and 80.0 m² of sail area. The 2000 Sabre 386, with an SA/D of 16.40 and 60.5 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 2010 Beneteau Oceanis 43 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 2010 Beneteau Oceanis 43 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 15.0) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.79). The 2000 Sabre 386 has a comfort ratio of 19.4 and a capsize screening value of 0.74. The ballast ratios are 31.6% for the 2010 Beneteau Oceanis 43 and 40.6% for the 2000 Sabre 386, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 2010 Beneteau Oceanis 43 provides 8 berths in 3 cabins with 300L of water capacity and 150L of fuel. The 2000 Sabre 386 offers 7 berths in 2 cabins with 189L water and 114L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 2000 Sabre 386 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2010 Beneteau Oceanis 43 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 2010 Beneteau Oceanis 43 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 2010 Beneteau Oceanis 43 · 2000 Sabre 386