2018 Hallberg-Rassy 40C vs 2000 Sabre 386 — Comparison

2018 Hallberg-Rassy 40C 2018 Hallberg-Rassy 40C
VS
2000 Sabre 386 2000 Sabre 386

Specifications Side by Side

Specification 2018 Hallberg-Rassy 40C 2000 Sabre 386
General
Manufacturer Hallberg-Rassy Sabre
Year 2018 2000–2007
Type Sloop Sloop
Country Sweden USA
Designer German Frers Jim Taylor
Dimensions
LOA 12.20 m (40.0 ft) 11.58 m (38.0 ft)
LWL 10.95 m (35.9 ft) 9.75 m (32.0 ft)
Beam 3.90 m (12.8 ft) 3.56 m (11.7 ft)
Draft 2.10 m (6.9 ft) 1.75 m (5.7 ft)
Weight
Displacement 9,500 kg (20,944 lbs) 7,257 kg (15,999 lbs)
Ballast 3,500 kg (7,716 lbs) 2,948 kg (6,499 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area 74.0 m² (797 ft²) 60.5 m² (651 ft²)
Hull Material Fiberglass Fiberglass
Keel Type Fin Fin
Engine & Tanks
Engine 55 HP 35 HP
Fuel Capacity 200 L (52.8 gal) 114 L (30.1 gal)
Water Capacity 400 L (105.7 gal) 189 L (49.9 gal)
Accommodation
Berths 6 7
Cabins 2 2

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
2018 Hallberg-Rassy 40C
16.76
2000 Sabre 386
16.40
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
2018 Hallberg-Rassy 40C
36.84
2000 Sabre 386
40.62
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
2018 Hallberg-Rassy 40C
0.74
2000 Sabre 386
0.74
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
2018 Hallberg-Rassy 40C
18.57
2000 Sabre 386
19.37

Detailed Comparison

The 2018 Hallberg-Rassy 40C and 2000 Sabre 386 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 2018 Hallberg-Rassy 40C is a modern design by Hallberg-Rassy from Sweden, while the 2000 Sabre 386 is a 2000s offering from Sabre from USA. The 2018 Hallberg-Rassy 40C was penned by German Frers. The 2000 Sabre 386 was designed by Jim Taylor.

In terms of size, the 2018 Hallberg-Rassy 40C measures 12.20m (40.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.90m, compared to the 2000 Sabre 386 at 11.58m (38.0ft) with a 3.56m beam. The 2018 Hallberg-Rassy 40C is 0.62m longer than the 2000 Sabre 386. The 2018 Hallberg-Rassy 40C displaces approximately 31% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 2018 Hallberg-Rassy 40C has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.76 and 74.0 m² of sail area. The 2000 Sabre 386, with an SA/D of 16.40 and 60.5 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 2018 Hallberg-Rassy 40C has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 2018 Hallberg-Rassy 40C offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 18.6) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.74). The 2000 Sabre 386 has a comfort ratio of 19.4 and a capsize screening value of 0.74. The ballast ratios are 36.8% for the 2018 Hallberg-Rassy 40C and 40.6% for the 2000 Sabre 386, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 2018 Hallberg-Rassy 40C provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 400L of water capacity and 200L of fuel. The 2000 Sabre 386 offers 7 berths in 2 cabins with 189L water and 114L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 2000 Sabre 386 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2018 Hallberg-Rassy 40C has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 2000 Sabre 386 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

VS