2010 Elan 340 vs 1985 Irwin 38 — Comparison

2010 Elan 3402010 Elan 340
VS
1985 Irwin 38

Specifications Side by Side

Specification2010 Elan 3401985 Irwin 38
General
ManufacturerElanIrwin
Year2010–20141985–1991
TypeSloopSloop
CountrySloveniaUSA
DesignerRob HumphreysTed Irwin
Dimensions
LOA10.36 m (34.0 ft)11.58 m (38.0 ft)
LWL9.00 m (29.5 ft)9.45 m (31.0 ft)
Beam3.40 m (11.2 ft)3.66 m (12.0 ft)
Draft1.95 m (6.4 ft)1.83 m (6.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement5,800 kg (12,787 lbs)7,484 kg (16,499 lbs)
Ballast1,750 kg (3,858 lbs)3,175 kg (7,000 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area55.0 m² (592 ft²)60.0 m² (646 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine21 HP35 HP
Fuel Capacity80 L (21.1 gal)114 L (30.1 gal)
Water Capacity160 L (42.3 gal)227 L (60.0 gal)
Accommodation
Berths67
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
2010 Elan 340
17.31
1985 Irwin 38
15.93
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
2010 Elan 340
30.17
1985 Irwin 38
42.42
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
2010 Elan 340
0.76
1985 Irwin 38
0.75
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
2010 Elan 340
19.73
1985 Irwin 38
20.06

Detailed Comparison

The 2010 Elan 340 and 1985 Irwin 38 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 2010 Elan 340 is a modern design by Elan from Slovenia, while the 1985 Irwin 38 is a 1980s offering from Irwin from USA. The 2010 Elan 340 was penned by Rob Humphreys. The 1985 Irwin 38 was designed by Ted Irwin.

In terms of size, the 2010 Elan 340 measures 10.36m (34.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.40m, compared to the 1985 Irwin 38 at 11.58m (38.0ft) with a 3.66m beam. The 1985 Irwin 38 is 1.22m longer than the 2010 Elan 340. The 1985 Irwin 38 displaces approximately 29% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 2010 Elan 340 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.31 and 55.0 m² of sail area. The 1985 Irwin 38, with an SA/D of 15.93 and 60.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 2010 Elan 340 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 2010 Elan 340 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 19.7) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.76). The 1985 Irwin 38 has a comfort ratio of 20.1 and a capsize screening value of 0.75. The ballast ratios are 30.2% for the 2010 Elan 340 and 42.4% for the 1985 Irwin 38, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 2010 Elan 340 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 160L of water capacity and 80L of fuel. The 1985 Irwin 38 offers 7 berths in 2 cabins with 227L water and 114L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1985 Irwin 38 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2010 Elan 340 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1985 Irwin 38 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 2010 Elan 340 · 1985 Irwin 38