2010 Elan 340 vs 1995 Feeling 39 — Comparison
2010 Elan 340
Specifications Side by Side
| Specification | 2010 Elan 340 | 1995 Feeling 39 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Manufacturer | Elan | Feeling |
| Year | 2010–2014 | 1995–2003 |
| Type | Sloop | Sloop |
| Country | Slovenia | France |
| Designer | Rob Humphreys | Philippe Harlé |
| Dimensions | ||
| LOA | 10.36 m (34.0 ft) | 11.80 m (38.7 ft) |
| LWL | 9.00 m (29.5 ft) | 10.06 m (33.0 ft) |
| Beam | 3.40 m (11.2 ft) | 3.78 m (12.4 ft) |
| Draft | 1.95 m (6.4 ft) | 1.80 m (5.9 ft) |
| Weight | ||
| Displacement | 5,800 kg (12,787 lbs) | 7,800 kg (17,196 lbs) |
| Ballast | 1,750 kg (3,858 lbs) | 3,000 kg (6,614 lbs) |
| Sailing | ||
| Sail Area | 55.0 m² (592 ft²) | 66.0 m² (710 ft²) |
| Hull Material | Fiberglass | Fiberglass |
| Keel Type | Fin | Fin |
| Engine & Tanks | ||
| Engine | 21 HP | 35 HP |
| Fuel Capacity | 80 L (21.1 gal) | 120 L (31.7 gal) |
| Water Capacity | 160 L (42.3 gal) | 250 L (66.0 gal) |
| Accommodation | ||
| Berths | 6 | 7 |
| Cabins | 2 | 3 |
Performance Comparison
Detailed Comparison
The 2010 Elan 340 and 1995 Feeling 39 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 2010 Elan 340 is a modern design by Elan from Slovenia, while the 1995 Feeling 39 is a 1990s offering from Feeling from France. The 2010 Elan 340 was penned by Rob Humphreys. The 1995 Feeling 39 was designed by Philippe Harlé.
In terms of size, the 2010 Elan 340 measures 10.36m (34.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.40m, compared to the 1995 Feeling 39 at 11.80m (38.7ft) with a 3.78m beam. The 1995 Feeling 39 is 1.44m longer than the 2010 Elan 340. The 1995 Feeling 39 displaces approximately 34% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.
Looking at performance, the 2010 Elan 340 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.31 and 55.0 m² of sail area. The 1995 Feeling 39, with an SA/D of 17.05 and 66.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The 2010 Elan 340 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.
For comfort and safety, the 2010 Elan 340 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 19.7) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.76). The 1995 Feeling 39 has a comfort ratio of 18.2 and a capsize screening value of 0.76. The ballast ratios are 30.2% for the 2010 Elan 340 and 38.5% for the 1995 Feeling 39, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.
Below deck, the 2010 Elan 340 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 160L of water capacity and 80L of fuel. The 1995 Feeling 39 offers 7 berths in 3 cabins with 250L water and 120L fuel capacity.
Verdict
For cruising: The 2010 Elan 340 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.
For racing: The 2010 Elan 340 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.
For liveaboard: The 1995 Feeling 39 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.
Compare Different Boats
Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats
Or view individual specs: 2010 Elan 340 · 1995 Feeling 39