2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40 vs 1973 Ranger 33 — Comparison

2010 Hallberg-Rassy 402010 Hallberg-Rassy 40
VS
1973 Ranger 331973 Ranger 33

Specifications Side by Side

Specification2010 Hallberg-Rassy 401973 Ranger 33
General
ManufacturerHallberg-RassyRanger
Year2010–20171973–1979
TypeSloopSloop
CountrySwedenUSA
DesignerGerman FrersGary Mull
Dimensions
LOA12.08 m (39.6 ft)10.06 m (33.0 ft)
LWL10.40 m (34.1 ft)8.23 m (27.0 ft)
Beam3.82 m (12.5 ft)3.05 m (10.0 ft)
Draft1.95 m (6.4 ft)1.52 m (5.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement9,200 kg (20,283 lbs)4,763 kg (10,501 lbs)
Ballast3,500 kg (7,716 lbs)2,041 kg (4,500 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area73.0 m² (786 ft²)43.0 m² (463 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine55 HP15 HP
Fuel Capacity200 L (52.8 gal)57 L (15.1 gal)
Water Capacity380 L (100.4 gal)95 L (25.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths66
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40
16.89
1973 Ranger 33
15.43
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40
38.04
1973 Ranger 33
42.85
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40
0.73
1973 Ranger 33
0.73
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40
19.94
1973 Ranger 33
21.50

Detailed Comparison

The 2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40 and 1973 Ranger 33 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40 is a modern design by Hallberg-Rassy from Sweden, while the 1973 Ranger 33 is a 1970s offering from Ranger from USA. The 2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40 was penned by German Frers. The 1973 Ranger 33 was designed by Gary Mull.

In terms of size, the 2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40 measures 12.08m (39.6ft) overall with a beam of 3.82m, compared to the 1973 Ranger 33 at 10.06m (33.0ft) with a 3.05m beam. The 2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40 is 2.02m longer than the 1973 Ranger 33. The 2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40 displaces approximately 93% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.89 and 73.0 m² of sail area. The 1973 Ranger 33, with an SA/D of 15.43 and 43.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 19.9) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.73). The 1973 Ranger 33 has a comfort ratio of 21.5 and a capsize screening value of 0.73. The ballast ratios are 38.0% for the 2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40 and 42.9% for the 1973 Ranger 33, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 380L of water capacity and 200L of fuel. The 1973 Ranger 33 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 95L water and 57L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1973 Ranger 33 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40 · 1973 Ranger 33