2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40 vs 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31 — Comparison

2010 Hallberg-Rassy 402010 Hallberg-Rassy 40
VS
1988 Pacific Seacraft 31

Specifications Side by Side

Specification2010 Hallberg-Rassy 401988 Pacific Seacraft 31
General
ManufacturerHallberg-RassyPacific Seacraft
Year2010–20171988–2007
TypeSloopSloop
CountrySwedenUSA
DesignerGerman FrersWilliam Crealock
Dimensions
LOA12.08 m (39.6 ft)9.45 m (31.0 ft)
LWL10.40 m (34.1 ft)7.62 m (25.0 ft)
Beam3.82 m (12.5 ft)3.05 m (10.0 ft)
Draft1.95 m (6.4 ft)1.37 m (4.5 ft)
Weight
Displacement9,200 kg (20,283 lbs)4,990 kg (11,001 lbs)
Ballast3,500 kg (7,716 lbs)2,177 kg (4,799 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area73.0 m² (786 ft²)40.5 m² (436 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFull
Engine & Tanks
Engine55 HP25 HP
Fuel Capacity200 L (52.8 gal)76 L (20.1 gal)
Water Capacity380 L (100.4 gal)151 L (39.9 gal)
Accommodation
Berths65
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40
16.89
1988 Pacific Seacraft 31
14.09
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40
38.04
1988 Pacific Seacraft 31
43.63
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40
0.73
1988 Pacific Seacraft 31
0.71
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40
19.94
1988 Pacific Seacraft 31
26.02

Detailed Comparison

The 2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40 and 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40 is a modern design by Hallberg-Rassy from Sweden, while the 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31 is a 1980s offering from Pacific Seacraft from USA. The 2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40 was penned by German Frers. The 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31 was designed by William Crealock.

In terms of size, the 2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40 measures 12.08m (39.6ft) overall with a beam of 3.82m, compared to the 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31 at 9.45m (31.0ft) with a 3.05m beam. The 2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40 is 2.63m longer than the 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31. The 2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40 displaces approximately 84% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.89 and 73.0 m² of sail area. The 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31, with an SA/D of 14.09 and 40.5 m² of canvas, offers modest sail power for its displacement. The 2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 19.9) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.73). The 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31 has a comfort ratio of 26.0 and a capsize screening value of 0.71. The ballast ratios are 38.0% for the 2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40 and 43.6% for the 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 380L of water capacity and 200L of fuel. The 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31 offers 5 berths in 2 cabins with 151L water and 76L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40 · 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31