Hanse 315 vs 1990 Feeling 32 — Comparison

Hanse 315
VS
1990 Feeling 321990 Feeling 32

Specifications Side by Side

SpecificationHanse 3151990 Feeling 32
General
ManufacturerHanseFeeling
Year2010–20161990–1998
TypeSloopSloop
CountryGermanyFrance
Designerjudel/vrolijk & coPhilippe Harlé
Dimensions
LOA9.65 m (31.7 ft)9.85 m (32.3 ft)
LWL8.55 m (28.1 ft)8.20 m (26.9 ft)
Beam3.15 m (10.3 ft)3.15 m (10.3 ft)
Draft1.65 m (5.4 ft)1.50 m (4.9 ft)
Weight
Displacement4,200 kg (9,259 lbs)4,700 kg (10,362 lbs)
Ballast1,200 kg (2,646 lbs)1,700 kg (3,748 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area41.5 m² (447 ft²)40.0 m² (431 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine15 HP18 HP
Fuel Capacity85 L (22.5 gal)60 L (15.9 gal)
Water Capacity120 L (31.7 gal)120 L (31.7 gal)
Accommodation
Berths45
Cabins12

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
Hanse 315
16.20
1990 Feeling 32
14.49
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
Hanse 315
28.57
1990 Feeling 32
36.17
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
Hanse 315
0.78
1990 Feeling 32
0.75
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
Hanse 315
17.75
1990 Feeling 32
20.72

Detailed Comparison

The Hanse 315 and 1990 Feeling 32 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The Hanse 315 is a modern design by Hanse from Germany, while the 1990 Feeling 32 is a 1990s offering from Feeling from France. The Hanse 315 was penned by judel/vrolijk & co. The 1990 Feeling 32 was designed by Philippe Harlé.

In terms of size, the Hanse 315 measures 9.65m (31.7ft) overall with a beam of 3.15m, compared to the 1990 Feeling 32 at 9.85m (32.3ft) with a 3.15m beam. The 1990 Feeling 32 is 0.20m longer than the Hanse 315. The 1990 Feeling 32 displaces approximately 12% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the Hanse 315 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.20 and 41.5 m² of sail area. The 1990 Feeling 32, with an SA/D of 14.49 and 40.0 m² of canvas, offers modest sail power for its displacement. The Hanse 315 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the Hanse 315 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 17.8) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.78). The 1990 Feeling 32 has a comfort ratio of 20.7 and a capsize screening value of 0.75. The ballast ratios are 28.6% for the Hanse 315 and 36.2% for the 1990 Feeling 32, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the Hanse 315 provides 4 berths in 1 cabin with 120L of water capacity and 85L of fuel. The 1990 Feeling 32 offers 5 berths in 2 cabins with 120L water and 60L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1990 Feeling 32 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Hanse 315 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1990 Feeling 32 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: Hanse 315 · 1990 Feeling 32