2010 X-Yachts Xc 35 vs 2003 Sabre 402 — Comparison

2010 X-Yachts Xc 35
VS
2003 Sabre 402

Specifications Side by Side

Specification2010 X-Yachts Xc 352003 Sabre 402
General
ManufacturerX-YachtsSabre
Year2010–20162003–2010
TypeSloopSloop
CountryDenmarkUSA
DesignerNiels JeppesenJim Taylor
Dimensions
LOA10.57 m (34.7 ft)12.19 m (40.0 ft)
LWL9.20 m (30.2 ft)10.36 m (34.0 ft)
Beam3.35 m (11.0 ft)3.72 m (12.2 ft)
Draft1.80 m (5.9 ft)1.83 m (6.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement5,800 kg (12,787 lbs)8,165 kg (18,001 lbs)
Ballast2,100 kg (4,630 lbs)3,266 kg (7,200 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area52.0 m² (560 ft²)66.0 m² (710 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine21 HP40 HP
Fuel Capacity70 L (18.5 gal)151 L (39.9 gal)
Water Capacity140 L (37.0 gal)227 L (60.0 gal)
Accommodation
Berths67
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
2010 X-Yachts Xc 35
16.37
2003 Sabre 402
16.54
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
2010 X-Yachts Xc 35
36.21
2003 Sabre 402
40.00
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
2010 X-Yachts Xc 35
0.75
2003 Sabre 402
0.74
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
2010 X-Yachts Xc 35
19.28
2003 Sabre 402
18.32

Detailed Comparison

The 2010 X-Yachts Xc 35 and 2003 Sabre 402 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 2010 X-Yachts Xc 35 is a modern design by X-Yachts from Denmark, while the 2003 Sabre 402 is a 2000s offering from Sabre from USA. The 2010 X-Yachts Xc 35 was penned by Niels Jeppesen. The 2003 Sabre 402 was designed by Jim Taylor.

In terms of size, the 2010 X-Yachts Xc 35 measures 10.57m (34.7ft) overall with a beam of 3.35m, compared to the 2003 Sabre 402 at 12.19m (40.0ft) with a 3.72m beam. The 2003 Sabre 402 is 1.62m longer than the 2010 X-Yachts Xc 35. The 2003 Sabre 402 displaces approximately 41% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 2010 X-Yachts Xc 35 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.37 and 52.0 m² of sail area. The 2003 Sabre 402, with an SA/D of 16.54 and 66.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 2003 Sabre 402 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 2010 X-Yachts Xc 35 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 19.3) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.75). The 2003 Sabre 402 has a comfort ratio of 18.3 and a capsize screening value of 0.74. The ballast ratios are 36.2% for the 2010 X-Yachts Xc 35 and 40.0% for the 2003 Sabre 402, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 2010 X-Yachts Xc 35 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 140L of water capacity and 70L of fuel. The 2003 Sabre 402 offers 7 berths in 2 cabins with 227L water and 151L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 2010 X-Yachts Xc 35 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2003 Sabre 402 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 2003 Sabre 402 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 2010 X-Yachts Xc 35 · 2003 Sabre 402