2011 J/111 vs Hunter 36 — Comparison

2011 J/111 2011 J/111
VS
Hunter 36 Hunter 36

Specifications Side by Side

Specification 2011 J/111 Hunter 36
General
Manufacturer J/Boats Hunter
Year 2011 1996–2001
Type Sloop Sloop
Country USA USA
Designer Alan Johnstone Glenn Henderson
Dimensions
LOA 11.13 m (36.5 ft) 10.82 m (35.5 ft)
LWL 9.75 m (32.0 ft) 9.45 m (31.0 ft)
Beam 3.40 m (11.2 ft) 3.56 m (11.7 ft)
Draft 2.20 m (7.2 ft) 1.83 m (6.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement 4,990 kg (11,001 lbs) 5,897 kg (13,001 lbs)
Ballast 2,041 kg (4,500 lbs) 2,313 kg (5,099 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area 71.0 m² (764 ft²) 56.0 m² (603 ft²)
Hull Material Fiberglass Fiberglass
Keel Type Fin Fin
Engine & Tanks
Engine 22 HP 27 HP
Fuel Capacity 57 L (15.1 gal) 95 L (25.1 gal)
Water Capacity 76 L (20.1 gal) 170 L (44.9 gal)
Accommodation
Berths 6 6
Cabins 2 2

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
2011 J/111
24.71
Hunter 36
17.43
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
2011 J/111
40.90
Hunter 36
39.22
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
2011 J/111
0.80
Hunter 36
0.79
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
2011 J/111
14.54
Hunter 36
17.17

Detailed Comparison

The 2011 J/111 and Hunter 36 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 2011 J/111 is a modern design by J/Boats from USA, while the Hunter 36 is a 1990s offering from Hunter from USA. The 2011 J/111 was penned by Alan Johnstone. The Hunter 36 was designed by Glenn Henderson.

In terms of size, the 2011 J/111 measures 11.13m (36.5ft) overall with a beam of 3.40m, compared to the Hunter 36 at 10.82m (35.5ft) with a 3.56m beam. The 2011 J/111 is 0.31m longer than the Hunter 36. The Hunter 36 displaces approximately 18% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 2011 J/111 has generous sail power for spirited sailing with an SA/D ratio of 24.71 and 71.0 m² of sail area. The Hunter 36, with an SA/D of 17.43 and 56.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The 2011 J/111 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 2011 J/111 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 14.5) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.80). The Hunter 36 has a comfort ratio of 17.2 and a capsize screening value of 0.79. The ballast ratios are 40.9% for the 2011 J/111 and 39.2% for the Hunter 36, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 2011 J/111 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 76L of water capacity and 57L of fuel. The Hunter 36 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 170L water and 95L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The Hunter 36 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2011 J/111 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

VS