Catalina 425 vs 1988 Moody 36 — Comparison

Catalina 425Catalina 425
VS
1988 Moody 361988 Moody 36

Specifications Side by Side

SpecificationCatalina 4251988 Moody 36
General
ManufacturerCatalinaMoody
Year20131988–1993
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAUK
DesignerGerry DouglasBill Dixon
Dimensions
LOA12.95 m (42.5 ft)10.97 m (36.0 ft)
LWL11.28 m (37.0 ft)9.14 m (30.0 ft)
Beam3.96 m (13.0 ft)3.51 m (11.5 ft)
Draft2.06 m (6.8 ft)1.52 m (5.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement9,616 kg (21,200 lbs)6,800 kg (14,991 lbs)
Ballast3,719 kg (8,199 lbs)2,700 kg (5,952 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area78.0 m² (840 ft²)54.0 m² (581 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine55 HP28 HP
Fuel Capacity152 L (40.2 gal)120 L (31.7 gal)
Water Capacity322 L (85.1 gal)200 L (52.8 gal)
Accommodation
Berths77
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
Catalina 425
17.52
1988 Moody 36
15.29
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
Catalina 425
38.68
1988 Moody 36
39.71
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
Catalina 425
0.75
1988 Moody 36
0.74
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
Catalina 425
17.02
1988 Moody 36
20.90

Detailed Comparison

The Catalina 425 and 1988 Moody 36 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The Catalina 425 is a modern design by Catalina from USA, while the 1988 Moody 36 is a 1980s offering from Moody from UK. The Catalina 425 was penned by Gerry Douglas. The 1988 Moody 36 was designed by Bill Dixon.

In terms of size, the Catalina 425 measures 12.95m (42.5ft) overall with a beam of 3.96m, compared to the 1988 Moody 36 at 10.97m (36.0ft) with a 3.51m beam. The Catalina 425 is 1.98m longer than the 1988 Moody 36. The Catalina 425 displaces approximately 41% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the Catalina 425 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.52 and 78.0 m² of sail area. The 1988 Moody 36, with an SA/D of 15.29 and 54.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The Catalina 425 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the Catalina 425 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 17.0) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.75). The 1988 Moody 36 has a comfort ratio of 20.9 and a capsize screening value of 0.74. The ballast ratios are 38.7% for the Catalina 425 and 39.7% for the 1988 Moody 36, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the Catalina 425 provides 7 berths in 2 cabins with 322L of water capacity and 152L of fuel. The 1988 Moody 36 offers 7 berths in 2 cabins with 200L water and 120L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1988 Moody 36 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Catalina 425 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: Catalina 425 · 1988 Moody 36