Catalina 315 vs 2003 Sabre 402 — Comparison

Catalina 315Catalina 315
VS
2003 Sabre 402

Specifications Side by Side

SpecificationCatalina 3152003 Sabre 402
General
ManufacturerCatalinaSabre
Year20142003–2010
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAUSA
DesignerGerry DouglasJim Taylor
Dimensions
LOA9.45 m (31.0 ft)12.19 m (40.0 ft)
LWL8.61 m (28.2 ft)10.36 m (34.0 ft)
Beam3.20 m (10.5 ft)3.72 m (12.2 ft)
Draft1.68 m (5.5 ft)1.83 m (6.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement4,536 kg (10,000 lbs)8,165 kg (18,001 lbs)
Ballast1,814 kg (3,999 lbs)3,266 kg (7,200 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area44.0 m² (474 ft²)66.0 m² (710 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine21 HP40 HP
Fuel Capacity76 L (20.1 gal)151 L (39.9 gal)
Water Capacity132 L (34.9 gal)227 L (60.0 gal)
Accommodation
Berths57
Cabins12

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
Catalina 315
16.32
2003 Sabre 402
16.54
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
Catalina 315
39.99
2003 Sabre 402
40.00
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
Catalina 315
0.77
2003 Sabre 402
0.74
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
Catalina 315
18.85
2003 Sabre 402
18.32

Detailed Comparison

The Catalina 315 and 2003 Sabre 402 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The Catalina 315 is a modern design by Catalina from USA, while the 2003 Sabre 402 is a 2000s offering from Sabre from USA. The Catalina 315 was penned by Gerry Douglas. The 2003 Sabre 402 was designed by Jim Taylor.

In terms of size, the Catalina 315 measures 9.45m (31.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.20m, compared to the 2003 Sabre 402 at 12.19m (40.0ft) with a 3.72m beam. The 2003 Sabre 402 is 2.74m longer than the Catalina 315. The 2003 Sabre 402 displaces approximately 80% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the Catalina 315 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.32 and 44.0 m² of sail area. The 2003 Sabre 402, with an SA/D of 16.54 and 66.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 2003 Sabre 402 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the Catalina 315 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 18.9) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.77). The 2003 Sabre 402 has a comfort ratio of 18.3 and a capsize screening value of 0.74. The ballast ratios are 40.0% for the Catalina 315 and 40.0% for the 2003 Sabre 402, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the Catalina 315 provides 5 berths in 1 cabin with 132L of water capacity and 76L of fuel. The 2003 Sabre 402 offers 7 berths in 2 cabins with 227L water and 151L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The Catalina 315 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2003 Sabre 402 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 2003 Sabre 402 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: Catalina 315 · 2003 Sabre 402