2014 Elan 400 vs 1983 Pearson 31 — Comparison

2014 Elan 4002014 Elan 400
VS
1983 Pearson 311983 Pearson 31

Specifications Side by Side

Specification2014 Elan 4001983 Pearson 31
General
ManufacturerElanPearson
Year2014–20181983–1990
TypeSloopSloop
CountrySloveniaUSA
DesignerRob HumphreysWilliam Shaw
Dimensions
LOA12.07 m (39.6 ft)9.45 m (31.0 ft)
LWL10.50 m (34.4 ft)7.77 m (25.5 ft)
Beam3.90 m (12.8 ft)3.10 m (10.2 ft)
Draft2.10 m (6.9 ft)1.52 m (5.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement8,200 kg (18,078 lbs)4,309 kg (9,500 lbs)
Ballast2,600 kg (5,732 lbs)1,814 kg (3,999 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area76.0 m² (818 ft²)40.0 m² (431 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine30 HP18 HP
Fuel Capacity120 L (31.7 gal)68 L (18.0 gal)
Water Capacity250 L (66.0 gal)114 L (30.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths76
Cabins32

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
2014 Elan 400
18.99
1983 Pearson 31
15.35
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
2014 Elan 400
31.71
1983 Pearson 31
42.10
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
2014 Elan 400
0.77
1983 Pearson 31
0.76
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
2014 Elan 400
17.08
1983 Pearson 31
21.43

Detailed Comparison

The 2014 Elan 400 and 1983 Pearson 31 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 2014 Elan 400 is a modern design by Elan from Slovenia, while the 1983 Pearson 31 is a 1980s offering from Pearson from USA. The 2014 Elan 400 was penned by Rob Humphreys. The 1983 Pearson 31 was designed by William Shaw.

In terms of size, the 2014 Elan 400 measures 12.07m (39.6ft) overall with a beam of 3.90m, compared to the 1983 Pearson 31 at 9.45m (31.0ft) with a 3.10m beam. The 2014 Elan 400 is 2.62m longer than the 1983 Pearson 31. The 2014 Elan 400 displaces approximately 90% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 2014 Elan 400 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 18.99 and 76.0 m² of sail area. The 1983 Pearson 31, with an SA/D of 15.35 and 40.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 2014 Elan 400 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 2014 Elan 400 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 17.1) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.77). The 1983 Pearson 31 has a comfort ratio of 21.4 and a capsize screening value of 0.76. The ballast ratios are 31.7% for the 2014 Elan 400 and 42.1% for the 1983 Pearson 31, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 2014 Elan 400 provides 7 berths in 3 cabins with 250L of water capacity and 120L of fuel. The 1983 Pearson 31 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L water and 68L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1983 Pearson 31 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2014 Elan 400 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 2014 Elan 400 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 2014 Elan 400 · 1983 Pearson 31