2014 X-Yachts X-40 vs 1983 Pearson 31 — Comparison

2014 X-Yachts X-40
VS
1983 Pearson 311983 Pearson 31

Specifications Side by Side

Specification2014 X-Yachts X-401983 Pearson 31
General
ManufacturerX-YachtsPearson
Year2014–20191983–1990
TypeSloopSloop
CountryDenmarkUSA
DesignerNiels JeppesenWilliam Shaw
Dimensions
LOA12.15 m (39.9 ft)9.45 m (31.0 ft)
LWL10.70 m (35.1 ft)7.77 m (25.5 ft)
Beam3.70 m (12.1 ft)3.10 m (10.2 ft)
Draft2.20 m (7.2 ft)1.52 m (5.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement8,000 kg (17,637 lbs)4,309 kg (9,500 lbs)
Ballast3,000 kg (6,614 lbs)1,814 kg (3,999 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area75.0 m² (807 ft²)40.0 m² (431 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine40 HP18 HP
Fuel Capacity110 L (29.1 gal)68 L (18.0 gal)
Water Capacity220 L (58.1 gal)114 L (30.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths76
Cabins32

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
2014 X-Yachts X-40
19.05
1983 Pearson 31
15.35
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
2014 X-Yachts X-40
37.50
1983 Pearson 31
42.10
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
2014 X-Yachts X-40
0.74
1983 Pearson 31
0.76
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
2014 X-Yachts X-40
17.35
1983 Pearson 31
21.43

Detailed Comparison

The 2014 X-Yachts X-40 and 1983 Pearson 31 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 2014 X-Yachts X-40 is a modern design by X-Yachts from Denmark, while the 1983 Pearson 31 is a 1980s offering from Pearson from USA. The 2014 X-Yachts X-40 was penned by Niels Jeppesen. The 1983 Pearson 31 was designed by William Shaw.

In terms of size, the 2014 X-Yachts X-40 measures 12.15m (39.9ft) overall with a beam of 3.70m, compared to the 1983 Pearson 31 at 9.45m (31.0ft) with a 3.10m beam. The 2014 X-Yachts X-40 is 2.70m longer than the 1983 Pearson 31. The 2014 X-Yachts X-40 displaces approximately 86% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 2014 X-Yachts X-40 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 19.05 and 75.0 m² of sail area. The 1983 Pearson 31, with an SA/D of 15.35 and 40.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 2014 X-Yachts X-40 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 2014 X-Yachts X-40 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 17.4) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.74). The 1983 Pearson 31 has a comfort ratio of 21.4 and a capsize screening value of 0.76. The ballast ratios are 37.5% for the 2014 X-Yachts X-40 and 42.1% for the 1983 Pearson 31, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 2014 X-Yachts X-40 provides 7 berths in 3 cabins with 220L of water capacity and 110L of fuel. The 1983 Pearson 31 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L water and 68L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1983 Pearson 31 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2014 X-Yachts X-40 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 2014 X-Yachts X-40 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 2014 X-Yachts X-40 · 1983 Pearson 31