Hanse 388 vs 1987 Cape Dory 40 — Comparison

Hanse 388
VS
1987 Cape Dory 40

Specifications Side by Side

SpecificationHanse 3881987 Cape Dory 40
General
ManufacturerHanseCape Dory
Year20171987–1992
TypeSloopSloop
CountryGermanyUSA
Designerjudel/vrolijk & coCarl Alberg
Dimensions
LOA11.40 m (37.4 ft)12.19 m (40.0 ft)
LWL10.34 m (33.9 ft)9.45 m (31.0 ft)
Beam3.73 m (12.2 ft)3.66 m (12.0 ft)
Draft2.10 m (6.9 ft)1.68 m (5.5 ft)
Weight
Displacement7,200 kg (15,873 lbs)8,618 kg (18,999 lbs)
Ballast2,200 kg (4,850 lbs)3,629 kg (8,001 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area63.0 m² (678 ft²)64.5 m² (694 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFull
Engine & Tanks
Engine29 HP40 HP
Fuel Capacity140 L (37.0 gal)151 L (39.9 gal)
Water Capacity260 L (68.7 gal)284 L (75.0 gal)
Accommodation
Berths67
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
Hanse 388
17.17
1987 Cape Dory 40
15.59
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
Hanse 388
30.56
1987 Cape Dory 40
42.11
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
Hanse 388
0.77
1987 Cape Dory 40
0.72
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
Hanse 388
16.86
1987 Cape Dory 40
22.29

Detailed Comparison

The Hanse 388 and 1987 Cape Dory 40 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The Hanse 388 is a modern design by Hanse from Germany, while the 1987 Cape Dory 40 is a 1980s offering from Cape Dory from USA. The Hanse 388 was penned by judel/vrolijk & co. The 1987 Cape Dory 40 was designed by Carl Alberg.

In terms of size, the Hanse 388 measures 11.40m (37.4ft) overall with a beam of 3.73m, compared to the 1987 Cape Dory 40 at 12.19m (40.0ft) with a 3.66m beam. The 1987 Cape Dory 40 is 0.79m longer than the Hanse 388. The 1987 Cape Dory 40 displaces approximately 20% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the Hanse 388 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.17 and 63.0 m² of sail area. The 1987 Cape Dory 40, with an SA/D of 15.59 and 64.5 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The Hanse 388 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the Hanse 388 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 16.9) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.77). The 1987 Cape Dory 40 has a comfort ratio of 22.3 and a capsize screening value of 0.72. The ballast ratios are 30.6% for the Hanse 388 and 42.1% for the 1987 Cape Dory 40, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the Hanse 388 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 260L of water capacity and 140L of fuel. The 1987 Cape Dory 40 offers 7 berths in 2 cabins with 284L water and 151L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1987 Cape Dory 40 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Hanse 388 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1987 Cape Dory 40 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: Hanse 388 · 1987 Cape Dory 40