2018 Hallberg-Rassy 40C vs 1983 Irwin 32 — Comparison

2018 Hallberg-Rassy 40C
VS
1983 Irwin 32

Specifications Side by Side

Specification2018 Hallberg-Rassy 40C1983 Irwin 32
General
ManufacturerHallberg-RassyIrwin
Year20181983–1988
TypeSloopSloop
CountrySwedenUSA
DesignerGerman FrersTed Irwin
Dimensions
LOA12.20 m (40.0 ft)9.75 m (32.0 ft)
LWL10.95 m (35.9 ft)8.08 m (26.5 ft)
Beam3.90 m (12.8 ft)3.20 m (10.5 ft)
Draft2.10 m (6.9 ft)1.52 m (5.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement9,500 kg (20,944 lbs)4,990 kg (11,001 lbs)
Ballast3,500 kg (7,716 lbs)2,041 kg (4,500 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area74.0 m² (797 ft²)41.0 m² (441 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine55 HP18 HP
Fuel Capacity200 L (52.8 gal)68 L (18.0 gal)
Water Capacity400 L (105.7 gal)114 L (30.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths66
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
2018 Hallberg-Rassy 40C
16.76
1983 Irwin 32
14.27
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
2018 Hallberg-Rassy 40C
36.84
1983 Irwin 32
40.90
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
2018 Hallberg-Rassy 40C
0.74
1983 Irwin 32
0.75
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
2018 Hallberg-Rassy 40C
18.57
1983 Irwin 32
22.12

Detailed Comparison

The 2018 Hallberg-Rassy 40C and 1983 Irwin 32 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 2018 Hallberg-Rassy 40C is a modern design by Hallberg-Rassy from Sweden, while the 1983 Irwin 32 is a 1980s offering from Irwin from USA. The 2018 Hallberg-Rassy 40C was penned by German Frers. The 1983 Irwin 32 was designed by Ted Irwin.

In terms of size, the 2018 Hallberg-Rassy 40C measures 12.20m (40.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.90m, compared to the 1983 Irwin 32 at 9.75m (32.0ft) with a 3.20m beam. The 2018 Hallberg-Rassy 40C is 2.45m longer than the 1983 Irwin 32. The 2018 Hallberg-Rassy 40C displaces approximately 90% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 2018 Hallberg-Rassy 40C has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.76 and 74.0 m² of sail area. The 1983 Irwin 32, with an SA/D of 14.27 and 41.0 m² of canvas, offers modest sail power for its displacement. The 2018 Hallberg-Rassy 40C has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 2018 Hallberg-Rassy 40C offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 18.6) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.74). The 1983 Irwin 32 has a comfort ratio of 22.1 and a capsize screening value of 0.75. The ballast ratios are 36.8% for the 2018 Hallberg-Rassy 40C and 40.9% for the 1983 Irwin 32, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 2018 Hallberg-Rassy 40C provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 400L of water capacity and 200L of fuel. The 1983 Irwin 32 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L water and 68L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1983 Irwin 32 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2018 Hallberg-Rassy 40C has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 2018 Hallberg-Rassy 40C · 1983 Irwin 32