1966 Islander 33 vs 2000 Sabre 386 — Comparison

1966 Islander 331966 Islander 33
VS
2000 Sabre 386

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1966 Islander 332000 Sabre 386
General
ManufacturerIslanderSabre
Year1966–19742000–2007
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAUSA
DesignerJoseph McGlassonJim Taylor
Dimensions
LOA10.06 m (33.0 ft)11.58 m (38.0 ft)
LWL7.62 m (25.0 ft)9.75 m (32.0 ft)
Beam2.97 m (9.7 ft)3.56 m (11.7 ft)
Draft1.52 m (5.0 ft)1.75 m (5.7 ft)
Weight
Displacement4,536 kg (10,000 lbs)7,257 kg (15,999 lbs)
Ballast1,814 kg (3,999 lbs)2,948 kg (6,499 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area42.0 m² (452 ft²)60.5 m² (651 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine15 HP35 HP
Fuel Capacity57 L (15.1 gal)114 L (30.1 gal)
Water Capacity76 L (20.1 gal)189 L (49.9 gal)
Accommodation
Berths67
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1966 Islander 33
15.57
2000 Sabre 386
16.40
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1966 Islander 33
39.99
2000 Sabre 386
40.62
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1966 Islander 33
0.72
2000 Sabre 386
0.74
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1966 Islander 33
23.44
2000 Sabre 386
19.37

Detailed Comparison

The 1966 Islander 33 and 2000 Sabre 386 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1966 Islander 33 is a classic design by Islander from USA, while the 2000 Sabre 386 is a 2000s offering from Sabre from USA. The 1966 Islander 33 was penned by Joseph McGlasson. The 2000 Sabre 386 was designed by Jim Taylor.

In terms of size, the 1966 Islander 33 measures 10.06m (33.0ft) overall with a beam of 2.97m, compared to the 2000 Sabre 386 at 11.58m (38.0ft) with a 3.56m beam. The 2000 Sabre 386 is 1.52m longer than the 1966 Islander 33. The 2000 Sabre 386 displaces approximately 60% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1966 Islander 33 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 15.57 and 42.0 m² of sail area. The 2000 Sabre 386, with an SA/D of 16.40 and 60.5 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 2000 Sabre 386 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1966 Islander 33 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 23.4) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.72). The 2000 Sabre 386 has a comfort ratio of 19.4 and a capsize screening value of 0.74. The ballast ratios are 40.0% for the 1966 Islander 33 and 40.6% for the 2000 Sabre 386, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1966 Islander 33 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 76L of water capacity and 57L of fuel. The 2000 Sabre 386 offers 7 berths in 2 cabins with 189L water and 114L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1966 Islander 33 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2000 Sabre 386 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 2000 Sabre 386 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1966 Islander 33 · 2000 Sabre 386