1972 Contest 31 vs 1976 C&C 33 — Comparison

1972 Contest 311972 Contest 31
VS
1976 C&C 33

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1972 Contest 311976 C&C 33
General
ManufacturerContestC&C Yachts
Year1972–19821976–1982
TypeSloopSloop
CountryNetherlandsCanada
DesignerDick ZaalCuthbertson & Cassian
Dimensions
LOA9.45 m (31.0 ft)10.06 m (33.0 ft)
LWL7.62 m (25.0 ft)8.23 m (27.0 ft)
Beam3.05 m (10.0 ft)3.35 m (11.0 ft)
Draft1.52 m (5.0 ft)1.52 m (5.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement4,536 kg (10,000 lbs)4,536 kg (10,000 lbs)
Ballast1,814 kg (3,999 lbs)2,041 kg (4,500 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area39.5 m² (425 ft²)42.0 m² (452 ft²)
Hull MaterialSteelFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine18 HP15 HP
Fuel Capacity80 L (21.1 gal)57 L (15.1 gal)
Water Capacity150 L (39.6 gal)95 L (25.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths56
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1972 Contest 31
14.65
1976 C&C 33
15.57
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1972 Contest 31
39.99
1976 C&C 33
45.00
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1972 Contest 31
0.74
1976 C&C 33
0.81
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1972 Contest 31
23.65
1976 C&C 33
18.07

Detailed Comparison

The 1972 Contest 31 and 1976 C&C 33 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1972 Contest 31 is a 1970s design by Contest from Netherlands, while the 1976 C&C 33 is a 1970s offering from C&C Yachts from Canada. The 1972 Contest 31 was penned by Dick Zaal. The 1976 C&C 33 was designed by Cuthbertson & Cassian.

In terms of size, the 1972 Contest 31 measures 9.45m (31.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.05m, compared to the 1976 C&C 33 at 10.06m (33.0ft) with a 3.35m beam. The 1976 C&C 33 is 0.61m longer than the 1972 Contest 31.

Looking at performance, the 1972 Contest 31 has modest sail power for its displacement with an SA/D ratio of 14.65 and 39.5 m² of sail area. The 1976 C&C 33, with an SA/D of 15.57 and 42.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 1976 C&C 33 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1972 Contest 31 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 23.7) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.74). The 1976 C&C 33 has a comfort ratio of 18.1 and a capsize screening value of 0.81. The ballast ratios are 40.0% for the 1972 Contest 31 and 45.0% for the 1976 C&C 33, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1972 Contest 31 provides 5 berths in 2 cabins with 150L of water capacity and 80L of fuel. The 1976 C&C 33 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 95L water and 57L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1972 Contest 31 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1976 C&C 33 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1976 C&C 33 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1972 Contest 31 · 1976 C&C 33