1972 Morgan 34 vs Hunter 380 — Comparison

1972 Morgan 341972 Morgan 34
VS
Hunter 380Hunter 380

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1972 Morgan 34Hunter 380
General
ManufacturerMorganHunter
Year1972–19782001–2005
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAUSA
DesignerCharley MorganGlenn Henderson
Dimensions
LOA10.36 m (34.0 ft)11.58 m (38.0 ft)
LWL8.08 m (26.5 ft)10.06 m (33.0 ft)
Beam3.25 m (10.7 ft)3.76 m (12.3 ft)
Draft1.52 m (5.0 ft)1.83 m (6.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement5,897 kg (13,001 lbs)7,257 kg (15,999 lbs)
Ballast2,449 kg (5,399 lbs)2,722 kg (6,001 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area50.2 m² (540 ft²)64.0 m² (689 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFullFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine22 HP35 HP
Fuel Capacity76 L (20.1 gal)114 L (30.1 gal)
Water Capacity114 L (30.1 gal)227 L (60.0 gal)
Accommodation
Berths67
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1972 Morgan 34
15.63
Hunter 380
17.35
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1972 Morgan 34
41.53
Hunter 380
37.51
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1972 Morgan 34
0.72
Hunter 380
0.78
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1972 Morgan 34
24.55
Hunter 380
17.27

Detailed Comparison

The 1972 Morgan 34 and Hunter 380 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1972 Morgan 34 is a 1970s design by Morgan from USA, while the Hunter 380 is a 2000s offering from Hunter from USA. The 1972 Morgan 34 was penned by Charley Morgan. The Hunter 380 was designed by Glenn Henderson.

In terms of size, the 1972 Morgan 34 measures 10.36m (34.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.25m, compared to the Hunter 380 at 11.58m (38.0ft) with a 3.76m beam. The Hunter 380 is 1.22m longer than the 1972 Morgan 34. The Hunter 380 displaces approximately 23% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1972 Morgan 34 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 15.63 and 50.2 m² of sail area. The Hunter 380, with an SA/D of 17.35 and 64.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The Hunter 380 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1972 Morgan 34 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 24.6) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.72). The Hunter 380 has a comfort ratio of 17.3 and a capsize screening value of 0.78. The ballast ratios are 41.5% for the 1972 Morgan 34 and 37.5% for the Hunter 380, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1972 Morgan 34 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L of water capacity and 76L of fuel. The Hunter 380 offers 7 berths in 2 cabins with 227L water and 114L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1972 Morgan 34 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Hunter 380 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The Hunter 380 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1972 Morgan 34 · Hunter 380