1994 J/105 vs Hunter 380 — Comparison

1994 J/105
VS
Hunter 380Hunter 380

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1994 J/105Hunter 380
General
ManufacturerJ/BoatsHunter
Year1994–20082001–2005
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAUSA
DesignerRod JohnstoneGlenn Henderson
Dimensions
LOA10.52 m (34.5 ft)11.58 m (38.0 ft)
LWL8.97 m (29.4 ft)10.06 m (33.0 ft)
Beam3.28 m (10.8 ft)3.76 m (12.3 ft)
Draft1.98 m (6.5 ft)1.83 m (6.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement3,856 kg (8,501 lbs)7,257 kg (15,999 lbs)
Ballast1,678 kg (3,699 lbs)2,722 kg (6,001 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area57.6 m² (620 ft²)64.0 m² (689 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine15 HP35 HP
Fuel Capacity38 L (10.0 gal)114 L (30.1 gal)
Water Capacity57 L (15.1 gal)227 L (60.0 gal)
Accommodation
Berths67
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1994 J/105
23.80
Hunter 380
17.35
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1994 J/105
43.52
Hunter 380
37.51
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1994 J/105
0.84
Hunter 380
0.78
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1994 J/105
13.68
Hunter 380
17.27

Detailed Comparison

The 1994 J/105 and Hunter 380 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1994 J/105 is a 1990s design by J/Boats from USA, while the Hunter 380 is a 2000s offering from Hunter from USA. The 1994 J/105 was penned by Rod Johnstone. The Hunter 380 was designed by Glenn Henderson.

In terms of size, the 1994 J/105 measures 10.52m (34.5ft) overall with a beam of 3.28m, compared to the Hunter 380 at 11.58m (38.0ft) with a 3.76m beam. The Hunter 380 is 1.06m longer than the 1994 J/105. The Hunter 380 displaces approximately 88% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1994 J/105 has generous sail power for spirited sailing with an SA/D ratio of 23.80 and 57.6 m² of sail area. The Hunter 380, with an SA/D of 17.35 and 64.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The 1994 J/105 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1994 J/105 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 13.7) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.84). The Hunter 380 has a comfort ratio of 17.3 and a capsize screening value of 0.78. The ballast ratios are 43.5% for the 1994 J/105 and 37.5% for the Hunter 380, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1994 J/105 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 57L of water capacity and 38L of fuel. The Hunter 380 offers 7 berths in 2 cabins with 227L water and 114L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The Hunter 380 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1994 J/105 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The Hunter 380 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1994 J/105 · Hunter 380