1973 Ericson 27 vs 1983 Pearson 31 — Comparison

1973 Ericson 27 1973 Ericson 27
VS
1983 Pearson 31 1983 Pearson 31

Specifications Side by Side

Specification 1973 Ericson 27 1983 Pearson 31
General
Manufacturer Ericson Pearson
Year 1973–1980 1983–1990
Type Sloop Sloop
Country USA USA
Designer Bruce King William Shaw
Dimensions
LOA 8.23 m (27.0 ft) 9.45 m (31.0 ft)
LWL 6.55 m (21.5 ft) 7.77 m (25.5 ft)
Beam 2.74 m (9.0 ft) 3.10 m (10.2 ft)
Draft 1.37 m (4.5 ft) 1.52 m (5.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement 2,495 kg (5,501 lbs) 4,309 kg (9,500 lbs)
Ballast 1,043 kg (2,299 lbs) 1,814 kg (3,999 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area 30.8 m² (332 ft²) 40.0 m² (431 ft²)
Hull Material Fiberglass Fiberglass
Keel Type Fin Fin
Engine & Tanks
Engine 10 HP 18 HP
Fuel Capacity 38 L (10.0 gal) 68 L (18.0 gal)
Water Capacity 57 L (15.1 gal) 114 L (30.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths 5 6
Cabins 1 2

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1973 Ericson 27
17.02
1983 Pearson 31
15.35
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1973 Ericson 27
41.80
1983 Pearson 31
42.10
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1973 Ericson 27
0.81
1983 Pearson 31
0.76
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1973 Ericson 27
20.13
1983 Pearson 31
21.43

Detailed Comparison

The 1973 Ericson 27 and 1983 Pearson 31 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1973 Ericson 27 is a 1970s design by Ericson from USA, while the 1983 Pearson 31 is a 1980s offering from Pearson from USA. The 1973 Ericson 27 was penned by Bruce King. The 1983 Pearson 31 was designed by William Shaw.

In terms of size, the 1973 Ericson 27 measures 8.23m (27.0ft) overall with a beam of 2.74m, compared to the 1983 Pearson 31 at 9.45m (31.0ft) with a 3.10m beam. The 1983 Pearson 31 is 1.22m longer than the 1973 Ericson 27. The 1983 Pearson 31 displaces approximately 73% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1973 Ericson 27 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.02 and 30.8 m² of sail area. The 1983 Pearson 31, with an SA/D of 15.35 and 40.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 1973 Ericson 27 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1973 Ericson 27 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 20.1) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.81). The 1983 Pearson 31 has a comfort ratio of 21.4 and a capsize screening value of 0.76. The ballast ratios are 41.8% for the 1973 Ericson 27 and 42.1% for the 1983 Pearson 31, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1973 Ericson 27 provides 5 berths in 1 cabin with 57L of water capacity and 38L of fuel. The 1983 Pearson 31 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L water and 68L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1983 Pearson 31 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1973 Ericson 27 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1983 Pearson 31 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

VS