1975 S2 9.2C vs 1978 C&C 24 — Comparison

1975 S2 9.2C
VS
1978 C&C 241978 C&C 24

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1975 S2 9.2C1978 C&C 24
General
ManufacturerS2C&C Yachts
Year1975–19821978–1983
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSACanada
DesignerArthur EdmundsCuthbertson & Cassian
Dimensions
LOA9.14 m (30.0 ft)7.32 m (24.0 ft)
LWL7.62 m (25.0 ft)6.10 m (20.0 ft)
Beam3.05 m (10.0 ft)2.44 m (8.0 ft)
Draft1.52 m (5.0 ft)1.22 m (4.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement4,082 kg (8,999 lbs)1,497 kg (3,300 lbs)
Ballast1,678 kg (3,699 lbs)612 kg (1,349 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area42.7 m² (460 ft²)24.0 m² (258 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine15 HP7 HP
Fuel Capacity57 L (15.1 gal)19 L (5.0 gal)
Water Capacity76 L (20.1 gal)30 L (7.9 gal)
Accommodation
Berths64
Cabins11

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1975 S2 9.2C
16.99
1978 C&C 24
18.64
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1975 S2 9.2C
41.11
1978 C&C 24
40.88
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1975 S2 9.2C
0.76
1978 C&C 24
0.85
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1975 S2 9.2C
21.78
1978 C&C 24
16.77

Detailed Comparison

The 1975 S2 9.2C and 1978 C&C 24 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1975 S2 9.2C is a 1970s design by S2 from USA, while the 1978 C&C 24 is a 1970s offering from C&C Yachts from Canada. The 1975 S2 9.2C was penned by Arthur Edmunds. The 1978 C&C 24 was designed by Cuthbertson & Cassian.

In terms of size, the 1975 S2 9.2C measures 9.14m (30.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.05m, compared to the 1978 C&C 24 at 7.32m (24.0ft) with a 2.44m beam. The 1975 S2 9.2C is 1.82m longer than the 1978 C&C 24. The 1975 S2 9.2C displaces approximately 173% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1975 S2 9.2C has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.99 and 42.7 m² of sail area. The 1978 C&C 24, with an SA/D of 18.64 and 24.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The 1978 C&C 24 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1975 S2 9.2C offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 21.8) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.76). The 1978 C&C 24 has a comfort ratio of 16.8 and a capsize screening value of 0.85. The ballast ratios are 41.1% for the 1975 S2 9.2C and 40.9% for the 1978 C&C 24, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1975 S2 9.2C provides 6 berths in 1 cabin with 76L of water capacity and 57L of fuel. The 1978 C&C 24 offers 4 berths in 1 cabin with 30L water and 19L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1975 S2 9.2C is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1978 C&C 24 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1975 S2 9.2C offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1975 S2 9.2C · 1978 C&C 24