1978 Sabre 30 vs 1982 Westerly Konsort — Comparison

1978 Sabre 301978 Sabre 30
VS
1982 Westerly Konsort1982 Westerly Konsort

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1978 Sabre 301982 Westerly Konsort
General
ManufacturerSabreWesterly
Year1978–19851982–1990
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAUK
DesignerRoger HewsonEd Dubois
Dimensions
LOA9.14 m (30.0 ft)9.50 m (31.2 ft)
LWL7.47 m (24.5 ft)7.70 m (25.3 ft)
Beam2.97 m (9.7 ft)3.10 m (10.2 ft)
Draft1.37 m (4.5 ft)1.07 m (3.5 ft)
Weight
Displacement3,629 kg (8,001 lbs)4,536 kg (10,000 lbs)
Ballast1,451 kg (3,199 lbs)1,633 kg (3,600 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area37.0 m² (398 ft²)34.0 m² (366 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinBilge
Engine & Tanks
Engine15 HP15 HP
Fuel Capacity45 L (11.9 gal)68 L (18.0 gal)
Water Capacity76 L (20.1 gal)114 L (30.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths56
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1978 Sabre 30
15.92
1982 Westerly Konsort
12.61
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1978 Sabre 30
39.98
1982 Westerly Konsort
36.00
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1978 Sabre 30
0.77
1982 Westerly Konsort
0.75
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1978 Sabre 30
20.59
1982 Westerly Konsort
22.75

Detailed Comparison

The 1978 Sabre 30 and 1982 Westerly Konsort represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1978 Sabre 30 is a 1970s design by Sabre from USA, while the 1982 Westerly Konsort is a 1980s offering from Westerly from UK. The 1978 Sabre 30 was penned by Roger Hewson. The 1982 Westerly Konsort was designed by Ed Dubois.

In terms of size, the 1978 Sabre 30 measures 9.14m (30.0ft) overall with a beam of 2.97m, compared to the 1982 Westerly Konsort at 9.50m (31.2ft) with a 3.10m beam. The 1982 Westerly Konsort is 0.36m longer than the 1978 Sabre 30. The 1982 Westerly Konsort displaces approximately 25% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1978 Sabre 30 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 15.92 and 37.0 m² of sail area. The 1982 Westerly Konsort, with an SA/D of 12.61 and 34.0 m² of canvas, offers modest sail power for its displacement. The 1978 Sabre 30 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1978 Sabre 30 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 20.6) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.77). The 1982 Westerly Konsort has a comfort ratio of 22.8 and a capsize screening value of 0.75. The ballast ratios are 40.0% for the 1978 Sabre 30 and 36.0% for the 1982 Westerly Konsort, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1978 Sabre 30 provides 5 berths in 2 cabins with 76L of water capacity and 45L of fuel. The 1982 Westerly Konsort offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L water and 68L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1982 Westerly Konsort is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1978 Sabre 30 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1982 Westerly Konsort offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1978 Sabre 30 · 1982 Westerly Konsort