1979 Westerly Fulmar vs 1972 Ranger 29 — Comparison

1979 Westerly Fulmar1979 Westerly Fulmar
VS
1972 Ranger 291972 Ranger 29

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1979 Westerly Fulmar1972 Ranger 29
General
ManufacturerWesterlyRanger
Year1979–19861972–1978
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUKUSA
DesignerEd DuboisGary Mull
Dimensions
LOA9.75 m (32.0 ft)8.84 m (29.0 ft)
LWL8.00 m (26.2 ft)7.32 m (24.0 ft)
Beam3.20 m (10.5 ft)2.84 m (9.3 ft)
Draft1.07 m (3.5 ft)1.52 m (5.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement4,990 kg (11,001 lbs)3,175 kg (7,000 lbs)
Ballast1,814 kg (3,999 lbs)1,361 kg (3,000 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area36.0 m² (388 ft²)35.0 m² (377 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeBilgeFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine18 HP13 HP
Fuel Capacity68 L (18.0 gal)45 L (11.9 gal)
Water Capacity136 L (35.9 gal)76 L (20.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths66
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1979 Westerly Fulmar
12.53
1972 Ranger 29
16.47
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1979 Westerly Fulmar
36.35
1972 Ranger 29
42.87
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1979 Westerly Fulmar
0.75
1972 Ranger 29
0.77
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1979 Westerly Fulmar
22.41
1972 Ranger 29
20.09

Detailed Comparison

The 1979 Westerly Fulmar and 1972 Ranger 29 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1979 Westerly Fulmar is a 1970s design by Westerly from UK, while the 1972 Ranger 29 is a 1970s offering from Ranger from USA. The 1979 Westerly Fulmar was penned by Ed Dubois. The 1972 Ranger 29 was designed by Gary Mull.

In terms of size, the 1979 Westerly Fulmar measures 9.75m (32.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.20m, compared to the 1972 Ranger 29 at 8.84m (29.0ft) with a 2.84m beam. The 1979 Westerly Fulmar is 0.91m longer than the 1972 Ranger 29. The 1979 Westerly Fulmar displaces approximately 57% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1979 Westerly Fulmar has modest sail power for its displacement with an SA/D ratio of 12.53 and 36.0 m² of sail area. The 1972 Ranger 29, with an SA/D of 16.47 and 35.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 1972 Ranger 29 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1979 Westerly Fulmar offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 22.4) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.75). The 1972 Ranger 29 has a comfort ratio of 20.1 and a capsize screening value of 0.77. The ballast ratios are 36.4% for the 1979 Westerly Fulmar and 42.9% for the 1972 Ranger 29, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1979 Westerly Fulmar provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 136L of water capacity and 68L of fuel. The 1972 Ranger 29 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 76L water and 45L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1979 Westerly Fulmar is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1972 Ranger 29 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1979 Westerly Fulmar · 1972 Ranger 29