1980 CS 33 vs Hunter 260 — Comparison
1980 CS 33
Hunter 260
Specifications Side by Side
| Specification | 1980 CS 33 | Hunter 260 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Manufacturer | CS Yachts | Hunter |
| Year | 1980–1987 | 1998–2004 |
| Type | Sloop | Sloop |
| Country | Canada | USA |
| Designer | Ray Wall | Glenn Henderson |
| Dimensions | ||
| LOA | 10.06 m (33.0 ft) | 7.85 m (25.8 ft) |
| LWL | 8.23 m (27.0 ft) | 6.86 m (22.5 ft) |
| Beam | 3.20 m (10.5 ft) | 2.74 m (9.0 ft) |
| Draft | 1.68 m (5.5 ft) | 1.37 m (4.5 ft) |
| Weight | ||
| Displacement | 4,763 kg (10,501 lbs) | 2,041 kg (4,500 lbs) |
| Ballast | 2,041 kg (4,500 lbs) | 771 kg (1,700 lbs) |
| Sailing | ||
| Sail Area | 49.1 m² (529 ft²) | 27.5 m² (296 ft²) |
| Hull Material | Fiberglass | Fiberglass |
| Keel Type | Fin | Fin |
| Engine & Tanks | ||
| Engine | 18 HP | 10 HP |
| Fuel Capacity | 68 L (18.0 gal) | 38 L (10.0 gal) |
| Water Capacity | 114 L (30.1 gal) | 57 L (15.1 gal) |
| Accommodation | ||
| Berths | 6 | 5 |
| Cabins | 2 | 1 |
Performance Comparison
Detailed Comparison
The 1980 CS 33 and Hunter 260 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1980 CS 33 is a 1980s design by CS Yachts from Canada, while the Hunter 260 is a 1990s offering from Hunter from USA. The 1980 CS 33 was penned by Ray Wall. The Hunter 260 was designed by Glenn Henderson.
In terms of size, the 1980 CS 33 measures 10.06m (33.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.20m, compared to the Hunter 260 at 7.85m (25.8ft) with a 2.74m beam. The 1980 CS 33 is 2.21m longer than the Hunter 260. The 1980 CS 33 displaces approximately 133% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.
Looking at performance, the 1980 CS 33 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.62 and 49.1 m² of sail area. The Hunter 260, with an SA/D of 17.37 and 27.5 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The 1980 CS 33 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.
For comfort and safety, the 1980 CS 33 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 20.2) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.76). The Hunter 260 has a comfort ratio of 16.0 and a capsize screening value of 0.87. The ballast ratios are 42.9% for the 1980 CS 33 and 37.8% for the Hunter 260, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.
Below deck, the 1980 CS 33 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L of water capacity and 68L of fuel. The Hunter 260 offers 5 berths in 1 cabin with 57L water and 38L fuel capacity.
Verdict
For cruising: The 1980 CS 33 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.
For racing: The 1980 CS 33 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.
For liveaboard: The 1980 CS 33 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.