1981 Ericson 30+ vs Catalina 270 — Comparison

1981 Ericson 30+
VS
Catalina 270Catalina 270

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1981 Ericson 30+Catalina 270
General
ManufacturerEricsonCatalina
Year1981–19861992–2002
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAUSA
DesignerBruce KingGerry Douglas
Dimensions
LOA9.14 m (30.0 ft)8.31 m (27.3 ft)
LWL7.62 m (25.0 ft)7.24 m (23.8 ft)
Beam3.05 m (10.0 ft)2.74 m (9.0 ft)
Draft1.52 m (5.0 ft)1.47 m (4.8 ft)
Weight
Displacement4,082 kg (8,999 lbs)2,313 kg (5,099 lbs)
Ballast1,678 kg (3,699 lbs)907 kg (2,000 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area39.7 m² (427 ft²)31.0 m² (334 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine15 HP12 HP
Fuel Capacity57 L (15.1 gal)45 L (11.9 gal)
Water Capacity76 L (20.1 gal)68 L (18.0 gal)
Accommodation
Berths65
Cabins11

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1981 Ericson 30+
15.79
Catalina 270
18.01
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1981 Ericson 30+
41.11
Catalina 270
39.21
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1981 Ericson 30+
0.76
Catalina 270
0.83
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1981 Ericson 30+
21.78
Catalina 270
16.24

Detailed Comparison

The 1981 Ericson 30+ and Catalina 270 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1981 Ericson 30+ is a 1980s design by Ericson from USA, while the Catalina 270 is a 1990s offering from Catalina from USA. The 1981 Ericson 30+ was penned by Bruce King. The Catalina 270 was designed by Gerry Douglas.

In terms of size, the 1981 Ericson 30+ measures 9.14m (30.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.05m, compared to the Catalina 270 at 8.31m (27.3ft) with a 2.74m beam. The 1981 Ericson 30+ is 0.83m longer than the Catalina 270. The 1981 Ericson 30+ displaces approximately 76% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1981 Ericson 30+ has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 15.79 and 39.7 m² of sail area. The Catalina 270, with an SA/D of 18.01 and 31.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The Catalina 270 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1981 Ericson 30+ offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 21.8) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.76). The Catalina 270 has a comfort ratio of 16.2 and a capsize screening value of 0.83. The ballast ratios are 41.1% for the 1981 Ericson 30+ and 39.2% for the Catalina 270, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1981 Ericson 30+ provides 6 berths in 1 cabin with 76L of water capacity and 57L of fuel. The Catalina 270 offers 5 berths in 1 cabin with 68L water and 45L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1981 Ericson 30+ is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Catalina 270 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1981 Ericson 30+ offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1981 Ericson 30+ · Catalina 270