1986 Pacific Seacraft 25 vs 1982 Freedom 28 — Comparison

1986 Pacific Seacraft 25
VS
1982 Freedom 281982 Freedom 28

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1986 Pacific Seacraft 251982 Freedom 28
General
ManufacturerPacific SeacraftFreedom
Year1986–20071982–1988
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAUSA
DesignerWilliam CrealockGarry Hoyt
Dimensions
LOA7.62 m (25.0 ft)8.53 m (28.0 ft)
LWL5.94 m (19.5 ft)7.01 m (23.0 ft)
Beam2.44 m (8.0 ft)2.84 m (9.3 ft)
Draft1.07 m (3.5 ft)1.14 m (3.7 ft)
Weight
Displacement2,268 kg (5,000 lbs)2,495 kg (5,501 lbs)
Ballast953 kg (2,101 lbs)907 kg (2,000 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area24.0 m² (258 ft²)29.0 m² (312 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFullFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine10 HP10 HP
Fuel Capacity30 L (7.9 gal)38 L (10.0 gal)
Water Capacity57 L (15.1 gal)57 L (15.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths45
Cabins11

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1986 Pacific Seacraft 25
14.13
1982 Freedom 28
16.02
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1986 Pacific Seacraft 25
42.02
1982 Freedom 28
36.35
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1986 Pacific Seacraft 25
0.74
1982 Freedom 28
0.84
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1986 Pacific Seacraft 25
25.59
1982 Freedom 28
17.13

Detailed Comparison

The 1986 Pacific Seacraft 25 and 1982 Freedom 28 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1986 Pacific Seacraft 25 is a 1980s design by Pacific Seacraft from USA, while the 1982 Freedom 28 is a 1980s offering from Freedom from USA. The 1986 Pacific Seacraft 25 was penned by William Crealock. The 1982 Freedom 28 was designed by Garry Hoyt.

In terms of size, the 1986 Pacific Seacraft 25 measures 7.62m (25.0ft) overall with a beam of 2.44m, compared to the 1982 Freedom 28 at 8.53m (28.0ft) with a 2.84m beam. The 1982 Freedom 28 is 0.91m longer than the 1986 Pacific Seacraft 25. The 1982 Freedom 28 displaces approximately 10% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1986 Pacific Seacraft 25 has modest sail power for its displacement with an SA/D ratio of 14.13 and 24.0 m² of sail area. The 1982 Freedom 28, with an SA/D of 16.02 and 29.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 1982 Freedom 28 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1986 Pacific Seacraft 25 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 25.6) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.74). The 1982 Freedom 28 has a comfort ratio of 17.1 and a capsize screening value of 0.84. The ballast ratios are 42.0% for the 1986 Pacific Seacraft 25 and 36.4% for the 1982 Freedom 28, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1986 Pacific Seacraft 25 provides 4 berths in 1 cabin with 57L of water capacity and 30L of fuel. The 1982 Freedom 28 offers 5 berths in 1 cabin with 57L water and 38L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1986 Pacific Seacraft 25 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1982 Freedom 28 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1982 Freedom 28 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1986 Pacific Seacraft 25 · 1982 Freedom 28