1993 Moody 31 vs 1982 Pacific Seacraft 27 — Comparison
1993 Moody 31
Specifications Side by Side
| Specification | 1993 Moody 31 | 1982 Pacific Seacraft 27 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Manufacturer | Moody | Pacific Seacraft |
| Year | 1993–2000 | 1982–2005 |
| Type | Sloop | Sloop |
| Country | UK | USA |
| Designer | Bill Dixon | William Crealock |
| Dimensions | ||
| LOA | 9.45 m (31.0 ft) | 8.23 m (27.0 ft) |
| LWL | 7.80 m (25.6 ft) | 6.55 m (21.5 ft) |
| Beam | 3.13 m (10.3 ft) | 2.64 m (8.7 ft) |
| Draft | 1.52 m (5.0 ft) | 1.14 m (3.7 ft) |
| Weight | ||
| Displacement | 4,500 kg (9,921 lbs) | 3,175 kg (7,000 lbs) |
| Ballast | 1,800 kg (3,968 lbs) | 1,361 kg (3,000 lbs) |
| Sailing | ||
| Sail Area | 40.5 m² (436 ft²) | 30.5 m² (328 ft²) |
| Hull Material | Fiberglass | Fiberglass |
| Keel Type | Bilge | Full |
| Engine & Tanks | ||
| Engine | 18 HP | 15 HP |
| Fuel Capacity | 68 L (18.0 gal) | 45 L (11.9 gal) |
| Water Capacity | 114 L (30.1 gal) | 76 L (20.1 gal) |
| Accommodation | ||
| Berths | 6 | 4 |
| Cabins | 2 | 1 |
Performance Comparison
Detailed Comparison
The 1993 Moody 31 and 1982 Pacific Seacraft 27 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1993 Moody 31 is a 1990s design by Moody from UK, while the 1982 Pacific Seacraft 27 is a 1980s offering from Pacific Seacraft from USA. The 1993 Moody 31 was penned by Bill Dixon. The 1982 Pacific Seacraft 27 was designed by William Crealock.
In terms of size, the 1993 Moody 31 measures 9.45m (31.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.13m, compared to the 1982 Pacific Seacraft 27 at 8.23m (27.0ft) with a 2.64m beam. The 1993 Moody 31 is 1.22m longer than the 1982 Pacific Seacraft 27. The 1993 Moody 31 displaces approximately 42% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.
Looking at performance, the 1993 Moody 31 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 15.10 and 40.5 m² of sail area. The 1982 Pacific Seacraft 27, with an SA/D of 14.35 and 30.5 m² of canvas, offers modest sail power for its displacement. The 1993 Moody 31 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.
For comfort and safety, the 1993 Moody 31 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 22.0) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.76). The 1982 Pacific Seacraft 27 has a comfort ratio of 26.9 and a capsize screening value of 0.72. The ballast ratios are 40.0% for the 1993 Moody 31 and 42.9% for the 1982 Pacific Seacraft 27, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.
Below deck, the 1993 Moody 31 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L of water capacity and 68L of fuel. The 1982 Pacific Seacraft 27 offers 4 berths in 1 cabin with 76L water and 45L fuel capacity.
Verdict
For cruising: The 1982 Pacific Seacraft 27 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.
For racing: The 1993 Moody 31 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.
For liveaboard: The 1993 Moody 31 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.
Compare Different Boats
Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats
Or view individual specs: 1993 Moody 31 · 1982 Pacific Seacraft 27