Catalina 250 vs 1982 Westerly Konsort — Comparison

Catalina 250Catalina 250
VS
1982 Westerly Konsort1982 Westerly Konsort

Specifications Side by Side

SpecificationCatalina 2501982 Westerly Konsort
General
ManufacturerCatalinaWesterly
Year1994–20041982–1990
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAUK
DesignerGerry DouglasEd Dubois
Dimensions
LOA7.62 m (25.0 ft)9.50 m (31.2 ft)
LWL6.78 m (22.2 ft)7.70 m (25.3 ft)
Beam2.59 m (8.5 ft)3.10 m (10.2 ft)
Draft1.37 m (4.5 ft)1.07 m (3.5 ft)
Weight
Displacement1,588 kg (3,501 lbs)4,536 kg (10,000 lbs)
Ballast612 kg (1,349 lbs)1,633 kg (3,600 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area24.5 m² (264 ft²)34.0 m² (366 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinBilge
Engine & Tanks
Engine10 HP15 HP
Fuel Capacity30 L (7.9 gal)68 L (18.0 gal)
Water Capacity42 L (11.1 gal)114 L (30.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths46
Cabins12

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
Catalina 250
18.30
1982 Westerly Konsort
12.61
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
Catalina 250
38.54
1982 Westerly Konsort
36.00
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
Catalina 250
0.89
1982 Westerly Konsort
0.75
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
Catalina 250
13.89
1982 Westerly Konsort
22.75

Detailed Comparison

The Catalina 250 and 1982 Westerly Konsort represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The Catalina 250 is a 1990s design by Catalina from USA, while the 1982 Westerly Konsort is a 1980s offering from Westerly from UK. The Catalina 250 was penned by Gerry Douglas. The 1982 Westerly Konsort was designed by Ed Dubois.

In terms of size, the Catalina 250 measures 7.62m (25.0ft) overall with a beam of 2.59m, compared to the 1982 Westerly Konsort at 9.50m (31.2ft) with a 3.10m beam. The 1982 Westerly Konsort is 1.88m longer than the Catalina 250. The 1982 Westerly Konsort displaces approximately 186% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the Catalina 250 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 18.30 and 24.5 m² of sail area. The 1982 Westerly Konsort, with an SA/D of 12.61 and 34.0 m² of canvas, offers modest sail power for its displacement. The Catalina 250 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the Catalina 250 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 13.9) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.89). The 1982 Westerly Konsort has a comfort ratio of 22.8 and a capsize screening value of 0.75. The ballast ratios are 38.5% for the Catalina 250 and 36.0% for the 1982 Westerly Konsort, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the Catalina 250 provides 4 berths in 1 cabin with 42L of water capacity and 30L of fuel. The 1982 Westerly Konsort offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L water and 68L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1982 Westerly Konsort is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Catalina 250 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1982 Westerly Konsort offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: Catalina 250 · 1982 Westerly Konsort