Catalina 250 vs 1990 Feeling 32 — Comparison

Catalina 250 Catalina 250
VS
1990 Feeling 32 1990 Feeling 32

Specifications Side by Side

Specification Catalina 250 1990 Feeling 32
General
Manufacturer Catalina Feeling
Year 1994–2004 1990–1998
Type Sloop Sloop
Country USA France
Designer Gerry Douglas Philippe Harlé
Dimensions
LOA 7.62 m (25.0 ft) 9.85 m (32.3 ft)
LWL 6.78 m (22.2 ft) 8.20 m (26.9 ft)
Beam 2.59 m (8.5 ft) 3.15 m (10.3 ft)
Draft 1.37 m (4.5 ft) 1.50 m (4.9 ft)
Weight
Displacement 1,588 kg (3,501 lbs) 4,700 kg (10,362 lbs)
Ballast 612 kg (1,349 lbs) 1,700 kg (3,748 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area 24.5 m² (264 ft²) 40.0 m² (431 ft²)
Hull Material Fiberglass Fiberglass
Keel Type Fin Fin
Engine & Tanks
Engine 10 HP 18 HP
Fuel Capacity 30 L (7.9 gal) 60 L (15.9 gal)
Water Capacity 42 L (11.1 gal) 120 L (31.7 gal)
Accommodation
Berths 4 5
Cabins 1 2

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
Catalina 250
18.30
1990 Feeling 32
14.49
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
Catalina 250
38.54
1990 Feeling 32
36.17
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
Catalina 250
0.89
1990 Feeling 32
0.75
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
Catalina 250
13.89
1990 Feeling 32
20.72

Detailed Comparison

The Catalina 250 and 1990 Feeling 32 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The Catalina 250 is a 1990s design by Catalina from USA, while the 1990 Feeling 32 is a 1990s offering from Feeling from France. The Catalina 250 was penned by Gerry Douglas. The 1990 Feeling 32 was designed by Philippe Harlé.

In terms of size, the Catalina 250 measures 7.62m (25.0ft) overall with a beam of 2.59m, compared to the 1990 Feeling 32 at 9.85m (32.3ft) with a 3.15m beam. The 1990 Feeling 32 is 2.23m longer than the Catalina 250. The 1990 Feeling 32 displaces approximately 196% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the Catalina 250 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 18.30 and 24.5 m² of sail area. The 1990 Feeling 32, with an SA/D of 14.49 and 40.0 m² of canvas, offers modest sail power for its displacement. The Catalina 250 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the Catalina 250 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 13.9) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.89). The 1990 Feeling 32 has a comfort ratio of 20.7 and a capsize screening value of 0.75. The ballast ratios are 38.5% for the Catalina 250 and 36.2% for the 1990 Feeling 32, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the Catalina 250 provides 4 berths in 1 cabin with 42L of water capacity and 30L of fuel. The 1990 Feeling 32 offers 5 berths in 2 cabins with 120L water and 60L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1990 Feeling 32 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Catalina 250 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1990 Feeling 32 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

VS