1994 Catalina 320 vs 1975 Pearson 28 — Comparison
1994 Catalina 320
1975 Pearson 28
Specifications Side by Side
| Specification | 1994 Catalina 320 | 1975 Pearson 28 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Manufacturer | Catalina | Pearson |
| Year | 1994–2007 | 1975–1982 |
| Type | Sloop | Sloop |
| Country | USA | USA |
| Designer | Gerry Douglas | William Shaw |
| Dimensions | ||
| LOA | 9.75 m (32.0 ft) | 8.53 m (28.0 ft) |
| LWL | 8.53 m (28.0 ft) | 7.01 m (23.0 ft) |
| Beam | 3.35 m (11.0 ft) | 2.74 m (9.0 ft) |
| Draft | 1.52 m (5.0 ft) | 1.37 m (4.5 ft) |
| Weight | ||
| Displacement | 4,763 kg (10,501 lbs) | 2,948 kg (6,499 lbs) |
| Ballast | 1,905 kg (4,200 lbs) | 1,270 kg (2,800 lbs) |
| Sailing | ||
| Sail Area | 47.4 m² (510 ft²) | 30.0 m² (323 ft²) |
| Hull Material | Fiberglass | Fiberglass |
| Keel Type | Fin | Fin |
| Engine & Tanks | ||
| Engine | 18 HP | 10 HP |
| Fuel Capacity | 76 L (20.1 gal) | 38 L (10.0 gal) |
| Water Capacity | 133 L (35.1 gal) | 57 L (15.1 gal) |
| Accommodation | ||
| Berths | 6 | 5 |
| Cabins | 2 | 1 |
Performance Comparison
Detailed Comparison
The 1994 Catalina 320 and 1975 Pearson 28 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1994 Catalina 320 is a 1990s design by Catalina from USA, while the 1975 Pearson 28 is a 1970s offering from Pearson from USA. The 1994 Catalina 320 was penned by Gerry Douglas. The 1975 Pearson 28 was designed by William Shaw.
In terms of size, the 1994 Catalina 320 measures 9.75m (32.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.35m, compared to the 1975 Pearson 28 at 8.53m (28.0ft) with a 2.74m beam. The 1994 Catalina 320 is 1.22m longer than the 1975 Pearson 28. The 1994 Catalina 320 displaces approximately 62% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.
Looking at performance, the 1994 Catalina 320 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.01 and 47.4 m² of sail area. The 1975 Pearson 28, with an SA/D of 14.83 and 30.0 m² of canvas, offers modest sail power for its displacement. The 1994 Catalina 320 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.
For comfort and safety, the 1994 Catalina 320 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 18.5) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.80). The 1975 Pearson 28 has a comfort ratio of 21.2 and a capsize screening value of 0.77. The ballast ratios are 40.0% for the 1994 Catalina 320 and 43.1% for the 1975 Pearson 28, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.
Below deck, the 1994 Catalina 320 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 133L of water capacity and 76L of fuel. The 1975 Pearson 28 offers 5 berths in 1 cabin with 57L water and 38L fuel capacity.
Verdict
For cruising: The 1975 Pearson 28 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.
For racing: The 1994 Catalina 320 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.
For liveaboard: The 1994 Catalina 320 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.
Compare Different Boats
Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats
Or view individual specs: 1994 Catalina 320 · 1975 Pearson 28