1994 Hallberg-Rassy 29 vs 1990 Feeling 32 — Comparison

1994 Hallberg-Rassy 29 1994 Hallberg-Rassy 29
VS
1990 Feeling 32 1990 Feeling 32

Specifications Side by Side

Specification 1994 Hallberg-Rassy 29 1990 Feeling 32
General
Manufacturer Hallberg-Rassy Feeling
Year 1994–2003 1990–1998
Type Sloop Sloop
Country Sweden France
Designer Olle Enderlein Philippe Harlé
Dimensions
LOA 8.85 m (29.0 ft) 9.85 m (32.3 ft)
LWL 7.70 m (25.3 ft) 8.20 m (26.9 ft)
Beam 3.02 m (9.9 ft) 3.15 m (10.3 ft)
Draft 1.50 m (4.9 ft) 1.50 m (4.9 ft)
Weight
Displacement 3,700 kg (8,157 lbs) 4,700 kg (10,362 lbs)
Ballast 1,500 kg (3,307 lbs) 1,700 kg (3,748 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area 38.0 m² (409 ft²) 40.0 m² (431 ft²)
Hull Material Fiberglass Fiberglass
Keel Type Fin Fin
Engine & Tanks
Engine 18 HP 18 HP
Fuel Capacity 60 L (15.9 gal) 60 L (15.9 gal)
Water Capacity 100 L (26.4 gal) 120 L (31.7 gal)
Accommodation
Berths 5 5
Cabins 2 2

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1994 Hallberg-Rassy 29
16.14
1990 Feeling 32
14.49
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1994 Hallberg-Rassy 29
40.54
1990 Feeling 32
36.17
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1994 Hallberg-Rassy 29
0.78
1990 Feeling 32
0.75
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1994 Hallberg-Rassy 29
20.16
1990 Feeling 32
20.72

Detailed Comparison

The 1994 Hallberg-Rassy 29 and 1990 Feeling 32 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1994 Hallberg-Rassy 29 is a 1990s design by Hallberg-Rassy from Sweden, while the 1990 Feeling 32 is a 1990s offering from Feeling from France. The 1994 Hallberg-Rassy 29 was penned by Olle Enderlein. The 1990 Feeling 32 was designed by Philippe Harlé.

In terms of size, the 1994 Hallberg-Rassy 29 measures 8.85m (29.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.02m, compared to the 1990 Feeling 32 at 9.85m (32.3ft) with a 3.15m beam. The 1990 Feeling 32 is 1.00m longer than the 1994 Hallberg-Rassy 29. The 1990 Feeling 32 displaces approximately 27% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1994 Hallberg-Rassy 29 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.14 and 38.0 m² of sail area. The 1990 Feeling 32, with an SA/D of 14.49 and 40.0 m² of canvas, offers modest sail power for its displacement. The 1994 Hallberg-Rassy 29 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1994 Hallberg-Rassy 29 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 20.2) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.78). The 1990 Feeling 32 has a comfort ratio of 20.7 and a capsize screening value of 0.75. The ballast ratios are 40.5% for the 1994 Hallberg-Rassy 29 and 36.2% for the 1990 Feeling 32, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1994 Hallberg-Rassy 29 provides 5 berths in 2 cabins with 100L of water capacity and 60L of fuel. The 1990 Feeling 32 offers 5 berths in 2 cabins with 120L water and 60L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1990 Feeling 32 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1994 Hallberg-Rassy 29 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

VS