1995 Beneteau Oceanis 321 vs 1982 Pacific Seacraft 27 — Comparison

1995 Beneteau Oceanis 3211995 Beneteau Oceanis 321
VS
1982 Pacific Seacraft 27

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1995 Beneteau Oceanis 3211982 Pacific Seacraft 27
General
ManufacturerBeneteauPacific Seacraft
Year1995–20011982–2005
TypeSloopSloop
CountryFranceUSA
DesignerGroupe FinotWilliam Crealock
Dimensions
LOA9.68 m (31.8 ft)8.23 m (27.0 ft)
LWL8.45 m (27.7 ft)6.55 m (21.5 ft)
Beam3.27 m (10.7 ft)2.64 m (8.7 ft)
Draft1.60 m (5.2 ft)1.14 m (3.7 ft)
Weight
Displacement4,200 kg (9,259 lbs)3,175 kg (7,000 lbs)
Ballast1,500 kg (3,307 lbs)1,361 kg (3,000 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area44.5 m² (479 ft²)30.5 m² (328 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFull
Engine & Tanks
Engine18 HP15 HP
Fuel Capacity68 L (18.0 gal)45 L (11.9 gal)
Water Capacity120 L (31.7 gal)76 L (20.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths64
Cabins21

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1995 Beneteau Oceanis 321
17.37
1982 Pacific Seacraft 27
14.35
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1995 Beneteau Oceanis 321
35.71
1982 Pacific Seacraft 27
42.87
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1995 Beneteau Oceanis 321
0.81
1982 Pacific Seacraft 27
0.72
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1995 Beneteau Oceanis 321
17.12
1982 Pacific Seacraft 27
26.91

Detailed Comparison

The 1995 Beneteau Oceanis 321 and 1982 Pacific Seacraft 27 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1995 Beneteau Oceanis 321 is a 1990s design by Beneteau from France, while the 1982 Pacific Seacraft 27 is a 1980s offering from Pacific Seacraft from USA. The 1995 Beneteau Oceanis 321 was penned by Groupe Finot. The 1982 Pacific Seacraft 27 was designed by William Crealock.

In terms of size, the 1995 Beneteau Oceanis 321 measures 9.68m (31.8ft) overall with a beam of 3.27m, compared to the 1982 Pacific Seacraft 27 at 8.23m (27.0ft) with a 2.64m beam. The 1995 Beneteau Oceanis 321 is 1.45m longer than the 1982 Pacific Seacraft 27. The 1995 Beneteau Oceanis 321 displaces approximately 32% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1995 Beneteau Oceanis 321 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.37 and 44.5 m² of sail area. The 1982 Pacific Seacraft 27, with an SA/D of 14.35 and 30.5 m² of canvas, offers modest sail power for its displacement. The 1995 Beneteau Oceanis 321 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1995 Beneteau Oceanis 321 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 17.1) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.81). The 1982 Pacific Seacraft 27 has a comfort ratio of 26.9 and a capsize screening value of 0.72. The ballast ratios are 35.7% for the 1995 Beneteau Oceanis 321 and 42.9% for the 1982 Pacific Seacraft 27, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1995 Beneteau Oceanis 321 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 120L of water capacity and 68L of fuel. The 1982 Pacific Seacraft 27 offers 4 berths in 1 cabin with 76L water and 45L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1982 Pacific Seacraft 27 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1995 Beneteau Oceanis 321 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1995 Beneteau Oceanis 321 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1995 Beneteau Oceanis 321 · 1982 Pacific Seacraft 27