1995 Beneteau Oceanis 321 vs 1986 Pacific Seacraft 25 — Comparison

1995 Beneteau Oceanis 3211995 Beneteau Oceanis 321
VS
1986 Pacific Seacraft 25

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1995 Beneteau Oceanis 3211986 Pacific Seacraft 25
General
ManufacturerBeneteauPacific Seacraft
Year1995–20011986–2007
TypeSloopSloop
CountryFranceUSA
DesignerGroupe FinotWilliam Crealock
Dimensions
LOA9.68 m (31.8 ft)7.62 m (25.0 ft)
LWL8.45 m (27.7 ft)5.94 m (19.5 ft)
Beam3.27 m (10.7 ft)2.44 m (8.0 ft)
Draft1.60 m (5.2 ft)1.07 m (3.5 ft)
Weight
Displacement4,200 kg (9,259 lbs)2,268 kg (5,000 lbs)
Ballast1,500 kg (3,307 lbs)953 kg (2,101 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area44.5 m² (479 ft²)24.0 m² (258 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFull
Engine & Tanks
Engine18 HP10 HP
Fuel Capacity68 L (18.0 gal)30 L (7.9 gal)
Water Capacity120 L (31.7 gal)57 L (15.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths64
Cabins21

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1995 Beneteau Oceanis 321
17.37
1986 Pacific Seacraft 25
14.13
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1995 Beneteau Oceanis 321
35.71
1986 Pacific Seacraft 25
42.02
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1995 Beneteau Oceanis 321
0.81
1986 Pacific Seacraft 25
0.74
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1995 Beneteau Oceanis 321
17.12
1986 Pacific Seacraft 25
25.59

Detailed Comparison

The 1995 Beneteau Oceanis 321 and 1986 Pacific Seacraft 25 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1995 Beneteau Oceanis 321 is a 1990s design by Beneteau from France, while the 1986 Pacific Seacraft 25 is a 1980s offering from Pacific Seacraft from USA. The 1995 Beneteau Oceanis 321 was penned by Groupe Finot. The 1986 Pacific Seacraft 25 was designed by William Crealock.

In terms of size, the 1995 Beneteau Oceanis 321 measures 9.68m (31.8ft) overall with a beam of 3.27m, compared to the 1986 Pacific Seacraft 25 at 7.62m (25.0ft) with a 2.44m beam. The 1995 Beneteau Oceanis 321 is 2.06m longer than the 1986 Pacific Seacraft 25. The 1995 Beneteau Oceanis 321 displaces approximately 85% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1995 Beneteau Oceanis 321 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.37 and 44.5 m² of sail area. The 1986 Pacific Seacraft 25, with an SA/D of 14.13 and 24.0 m² of canvas, offers modest sail power for its displacement. The 1995 Beneteau Oceanis 321 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1995 Beneteau Oceanis 321 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 17.1) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.81). The 1986 Pacific Seacraft 25 has a comfort ratio of 25.6 and a capsize screening value of 0.74. The ballast ratios are 35.7% for the 1995 Beneteau Oceanis 321 and 42.0% for the 1986 Pacific Seacraft 25, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1995 Beneteau Oceanis 321 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 120L of water capacity and 68L of fuel. The 1986 Pacific Seacraft 25 offers 4 berths in 1 cabin with 57L water and 30L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1986 Pacific Seacraft 25 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1995 Beneteau Oceanis 321 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1995 Beneteau Oceanis 321 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1995 Beneteau Oceanis 321 · 1986 Pacific Seacraft 25