1995 Feeling 39 vs 1983 Irwin 32 — Comparison

1995 Feeling 39
VS
1983 Irwin 32

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1995 Feeling 391983 Irwin 32
General
ManufacturerFeelingIrwin
Year1995–20031983–1988
TypeSloopSloop
CountryFranceUSA
DesignerPhilippe HarléTed Irwin
Dimensions
LOA11.80 m (38.7 ft)9.75 m (32.0 ft)
LWL10.06 m (33.0 ft)8.08 m (26.5 ft)
Beam3.78 m (12.4 ft)3.20 m (10.5 ft)
Draft1.80 m (5.9 ft)1.52 m (5.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement7,800 kg (17,196 lbs)4,990 kg (11,001 lbs)
Ballast3,000 kg (6,614 lbs)2,041 kg (4,500 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area66.0 m² (710 ft²)41.0 m² (441 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine35 HP18 HP
Fuel Capacity120 L (31.7 gal)68 L (18.0 gal)
Water Capacity250 L (66.0 gal)114 L (30.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths76
Cabins32

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1995 Feeling 39
17.05
1983 Irwin 32
14.27
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1995 Feeling 39
38.46
1983 Irwin 32
40.90
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1995 Feeling 39
0.76
1983 Irwin 32
0.75
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1995 Feeling 39
18.21
1983 Irwin 32
22.12

Detailed Comparison

The 1995 Feeling 39 and 1983 Irwin 32 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1995 Feeling 39 is a 1990s design by Feeling from France, while the 1983 Irwin 32 is a 1980s offering from Irwin from USA. The 1995 Feeling 39 was penned by Philippe Harlé. The 1983 Irwin 32 was designed by Ted Irwin.

In terms of size, the 1995 Feeling 39 measures 11.80m (38.7ft) overall with a beam of 3.78m, compared to the 1983 Irwin 32 at 9.75m (32.0ft) with a 3.20m beam. The 1995 Feeling 39 is 2.05m longer than the 1983 Irwin 32. The 1995 Feeling 39 displaces approximately 56% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1995 Feeling 39 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.05 and 66.0 m² of sail area. The 1983 Irwin 32, with an SA/D of 14.27 and 41.0 m² of canvas, offers modest sail power for its displacement. The 1995 Feeling 39 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1995 Feeling 39 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 18.2) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.76). The 1983 Irwin 32 has a comfort ratio of 22.1 and a capsize screening value of 0.75. The ballast ratios are 38.5% for the 1995 Feeling 39 and 40.9% for the 1983 Irwin 32, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1995 Feeling 39 provides 7 berths in 3 cabins with 250L of water capacity and 120L of fuel. The 1983 Irwin 32 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L water and 68L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1983 Irwin 32 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1995 Feeling 39 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1995 Feeling 39 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1995 Feeling 39 · 1983 Irwin 32