Hunter 36 vs 1986 Island Packet 27 — Comparison

Hunter 36Hunter 36
VS
1986 Island Packet 27

Specifications Side by Side

SpecificationHunter 361986 Island Packet 27
General
ManufacturerHunterIsland Packet
Year1996–20011986–1994
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAUSA
DesignerGlenn HendersonBob Johnson
Dimensions
LOA10.82 m (35.5 ft)8.23 m (27.0 ft)
LWL9.45 m (31.0 ft)7.01 m (23.0 ft)
Beam3.56 m (11.7 ft)2.90 m (9.5 ft)
Draft1.83 m (6.0 ft)1.07 m (3.5 ft)
Weight
Displacement5,897 kg (13,001 lbs)3,175 kg (7,000 lbs)
Ballast2,313 kg (5,099 lbs)1,270 kg (2,800 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area56.0 m² (603 ft²)29.0 m² (312 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFull
Engine & Tanks
Engine27 HP15 HP
Fuel Capacity95 L (25.1 gal)57 L (15.1 gal)
Water Capacity170 L (44.9 gal)95 L (25.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths64
Cabins21

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
Hunter 36
17.43
1986 Island Packet 27
13.64
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
Hunter 36
39.22
1986 Island Packet 27
40.00
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
Hunter 36
0.79
1986 Island Packet 27
0.79
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
Hunter 36
17.17
1986 Island Packet 27
21.72

Detailed Comparison

The Hunter 36 and 1986 Island Packet 27 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The Hunter 36 is a 1990s design by Hunter from USA, while the 1986 Island Packet 27 is a 1980s offering from Island Packet from USA. The Hunter 36 was penned by Glenn Henderson. The 1986 Island Packet 27 was designed by Bob Johnson.

In terms of size, the Hunter 36 measures 10.82m (35.5ft) overall with a beam of 3.56m, compared to the 1986 Island Packet 27 at 8.23m (27.0ft) with a 2.90m beam. The Hunter 36 is 2.59m longer than the 1986 Island Packet 27. The Hunter 36 displaces approximately 86% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the Hunter 36 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.43 and 56.0 m² of sail area. The 1986 Island Packet 27, with an SA/D of 13.64 and 29.0 m² of canvas, offers modest sail power for its displacement. The Hunter 36 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the Hunter 36 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 17.2) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.79). The 1986 Island Packet 27 has a comfort ratio of 21.7 and a capsize screening value of 0.79. The ballast ratios are 39.2% for the Hunter 36 and 40.0% for the 1986 Island Packet 27, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the Hunter 36 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 170L of water capacity and 95L of fuel. The 1986 Island Packet 27 offers 4 berths in 1 cabin with 95L water and 57L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1986 Island Packet 27 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Hunter 36 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The Hunter 36 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: Hunter 36 · 1986 Island Packet 27