1997 Nautor Swan 40 vs Hanse 400 — Comparison

1997 Nautor Swan 40 1997 Nautor Swan 40
VS
Hanse 400 Hanse 400

Specifications Side by Side

Specification 1997 Nautor Swan 40 Hanse 400
General
Manufacturer Nautor Swan Hanse
Year 1997–2002 2002–2006
Type Sloop Sloop
Country Finland Germany
Designer German Frers judel/vrolijk & co
Dimensions
LOA 12.30 m (40.4 ft) 12.10 m (39.7 ft)
LWL 10.36 m (34.0 ft) 10.60 m (34.8 ft)
Beam 3.85 m (12.6 ft) 3.80 m (12.5 ft)
Draft 2.20 m (7.2 ft) 1.95 m (6.4 ft)
Weight
Displacement 8,500 kg (18,739 lbs) 7,600 kg (16,755 lbs)
Ballast 3,600 kg (7,937 lbs) 2,350 kg (5,181 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area 73.5 m² (791 ft²) 68.0 m² (732 ft²)
Hull Material Fiberglass Fiberglass
Keel Type Fin Fin
Engine & Tanks
Engine 40 HP 29 HP
Fuel Capacity 150 L (39.6 gal) 150 L (39.6 gal)
Water Capacity 250 L (66.0 gal) 280 L (74.0 gal)
Accommodation
Berths 6 8
Cabins 2 3

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1997 Nautor Swan 40
17.93
Hanse 400
17.87
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1997 Nautor Swan 40
42.35
Hanse 400
30.92
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1997 Nautor Swan 40
0.76
Hanse 400
0.77
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1997 Nautor Swan 40
18.11
Hanse 400
16.16

Detailed Comparison

The 1997 Nautor Swan 40 and Hanse 400 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1997 Nautor Swan 40 is a 1990s design by Nautor Swan from Finland, while the Hanse 400 is a 2000s offering from Hanse from Germany. The 1997 Nautor Swan 40 was penned by German Frers. The Hanse 400 was designed by judel/vrolijk & co.

In terms of size, the 1997 Nautor Swan 40 measures 12.30m (40.4ft) overall with a beam of 3.85m, compared to the Hanse 400 at 12.10m (39.7ft) with a 3.80m beam. The 1997 Nautor Swan 40 is 0.20m longer than the Hanse 400. The 1997 Nautor Swan 40 displaces approximately 12% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1997 Nautor Swan 40 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.93 and 73.5 m² of sail area. The Hanse 400, with an SA/D of 17.87 and 68.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The 1997 Nautor Swan 40 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1997 Nautor Swan 40 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 18.1) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.76). The Hanse 400 has a comfort ratio of 16.2 and a capsize screening value of 0.77. The ballast ratios are 42.4% for the 1997 Nautor Swan 40 and 30.9% for the Hanse 400, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1997 Nautor Swan 40 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 250L of water capacity and 150L of fuel. The Hanse 400 offers 8 berths in 3 cabins with 280L water and 150L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1997 Nautor Swan 40 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1997 Nautor Swan 40 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The Hanse 400 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

VS