Hunter 280 vs 2002 X-Yachts X-37 — Comparison

Hunter 280 Hunter 280
VS
2002 X-Yachts X-37 2002 X-Yachts X-37

Specifications Side by Side

Specification Hunter 280 2002 X-Yachts X-37
General
Manufacturer Hunter X-Yachts
Year 1998–2003 2002–2008
Type Sloop Sloop
Country USA Denmark
Designer Glenn Henderson Niels Jeppesen
Dimensions
LOA 8.53 m (28.0 ft) 11.15 m (36.6 ft)
LWL 7.47 m (24.5 ft) 9.75 m (32.0 ft)
Beam 2.82 m (9.3 ft) 3.42 m (11.2 ft)
Draft 1.52 m (5.0 ft) 2.15 m (7.1 ft)
Weight
Displacement 2,585 kg (5,699 lbs) 6,500 kg (14,330 lbs)
Ballast 998 kg (2,200 lbs) 2,500 kg (5,512 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area 34.0 m² (366 ft²) 62.0 m² (667 ft²)
Hull Material Fiberglass Fiberglass
Keel Type Fin Fin
Engine & Tanks
Engine 15 HP 28 HP
Fuel Capacity 45 L (11.9 gal) 80 L (21.1 gal)
Water Capacity 76 L (20.1 gal) 150 L (39.6 gal)
Accommodation
Berths 5 6
Cabins 1 2

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
Hunter 280
18.35
2002 X-Yachts X-37
18.09
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
Hunter 280
38.61
2002 X-Yachts X-37
38.46
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
Hunter 280
0.82
2002 X-Yachts X-37
0.73
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
Hunter 280
16.46
2002 X-Yachts X-37
18.77

Detailed Comparison

The Hunter 280 and 2002 X-Yachts X-37 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The Hunter 280 is a 1990s design by Hunter from USA, while the 2002 X-Yachts X-37 is a 2000s offering from X-Yachts from Denmark. The Hunter 280 was penned by Glenn Henderson. The 2002 X-Yachts X-37 was designed by Niels Jeppesen.

In terms of size, the Hunter 280 measures 8.53m (28.0ft) overall with a beam of 2.82m, compared to the 2002 X-Yachts X-37 at 11.15m (36.6ft) with a 3.42m beam. The 2002 X-Yachts X-37 is 2.62m longer than the Hunter 280. The 2002 X-Yachts X-37 displaces approximately 151% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the Hunter 280 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 18.35 and 34.0 m² of sail area. The 2002 X-Yachts X-37, with an SA/D of 18.09 and 62.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The Hunter 280 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the Hunter 280 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 16.5) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.82). The 2002 X-Yachts X-37 has a comfort ratio of 18.8 and a capsize screening value of 0.73. The ballast ratios are 38.6% for the Hunter 280 and 38.5% for the 2002 X-Yachts X-37, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the Hunter 280 provides 5 berths in 1 cabin with 76L of water capacity and 45L of fuel. The 2002 X-Yachts X-37 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 150L water and 80L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 2002 X-Yachts X-37 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Hunter 280 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 2002 X-Yachts X-37 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

VS