1999 Catalina 400 vs 1982 Westerly Konsort — Comparison

1999 Catalina 4001999 Catalina 400
VS
1982 Westerly Konsort1982 Westerly Konsort

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1999 Catalina 4001982 Westerly Konsort
General
ManufacturerCatalinaWesterly
Year1999–20061982–1990
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAUK
DesignerGerry DouglasEd Dubois
Dimensions
LOA12.12 m (39.8 ft)9.50 m (31.2 ft)
LWL10.36 m (34.0 ft)7.70 m (25.3 ft)
Beam3.86 m (12.7 ft)3.10 m (10.2 ft)
Draft1.98 m (6.5 ft)1.07 m (3.5 ft)
Weight
Displacement8,845 kg (19,500 lbs)4,536 kg (10,000 lbs)
Ballast3,629 kg (8,001 lbs)1,633 kg (3,600 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area66.9 m² (720 ft²)34.0 m² (366 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinBilge
Engine & Tanks
Engine40 HP15 HP
Fuel Capacity151 L (39.9 gal)68 L (18.0 gal)
Water Capacity303 L (80.0 gal)114 L (30.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths86
Cabins32

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1999 Catalina 400
15.89
1982 Westerly Konsort
12.61
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1999 Catalina 400
41.03
1982 Westerly Konsort
36.00
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1999 Catalina 400
0.75
1982 Westerly Konsort
0.75
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1999 Catalina 400
18.97
1982 Westerly Konsort
22.75

Detailed Comparison

The 1999 Catalina 400 and 1982 Westerly Konsort represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1999 Catalina 400 is a 1990s design by Catalina from USA, while the 1982 Westerly Konsort is a 1980s offering from Westerly from UK. The 1999 Catalina 400 was penned by Gerry Douglas. The 1982 Westerly Konsort was designed by Ed Dubois.

In terms of size, the 1999 Catalina 400 measures 12.12m (39.8ft) overall with a beam of 3.86m, compared to the 1982 Westerly Konsort at 9.50m (31.2ft) with a 3.10m beam. The 1999 Catalina 400 is 2.62m longer than the 1982 Westerly Konsort. The 1999 Catalina 400 displaces approximately 95% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1999 Catalina 400 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 15.89 and 66.9 m² of sail area. The 1982 Westerly Konsort, with an SA/D of 12.61 and 34.0 m² of canvas, offers modest sail power for its displacement. The 1999 Catalina 400 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1999 Catalina 400 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 19.0) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.75). The 1982 Westerly Konsort has a comfort ratio of 22.8 and a capsize screening value of 0.75. The ballast ratios are 41.0% for the 1999 Catalina 400 and 36.0% for the 1982 Westerly Konsort, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1999 Catalina 400 provides 8 berths in 3 cabins with 303L of water capacity and 151L of fuel. The 1982 Westerly Konsort offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L water and 68L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1982 Westerly Konsort is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1999 Catalina 400 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1999 Catalina 400 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1999 Catalina 400 · 1982 Westerly Konsort