2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40 vs 1982 Westerly Konsort — Comparison

2010 Hallberg-Rassy 402010 Hallberg-Rassy 40
VS
1982 Westerly Konsort1982 Westerly Konsort

Specifications Side by Side

Specification2010 Hallberg-Rassy 401982 Westerly Konsort
General
ManufacturerHallberg-RassyWesterly
Year2010–20171982–1990
TypeSloopSloop
CountrySwedenUK
DesignerGerman FrersEd Dubois
Dimensions
LOA12.08 m (39.6 ft)9.50 m (31.2 ft)
LWL10.40 m (34.1 ft)7.70 m (25.3 ft)
Beam3.82 m (12.5 ft)3.10 m (10.2 ft)
Draft1.95 m (6.4 ft)1.07 m (3.5 ft)
Weight
Displacement9,200 kg (20,283 lbs)4,536 kg (10,000 lbs)
Ballast3,500 kg (7,716 lbs)1,633 kg (3,600 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area73.0 m² (786 ft²)34.0 m² (366 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinBilge
Engine & Tanks
Engine55 HP15 HP
Fuel Capacity200 L (52.8 gal)68 L (18.0 gal)
Water Capacity380 L (100.4 gal)114 L (30.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths66
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40
16.89
1982 Westerly Konsort
12.61
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40
38.04
1982 Westerly Konsort
36.00
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40
0.73
1982 Westerly Konsort
0.75
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40
19.94
1982 Westerly Konsort
22.75

Detailed Comparison

The 2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40 and 1982 Westerly Konsort represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40 is a modern design by Hallberg-Rassy from Sweden, while the 1982 Westerly Konsort is a 1980s offering from Westerly from UK. The 2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40 was penned by German Frers. The 1982 Westerly Konsort was designed by Ed Dubois.

In terms of size, the 2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40 measures 12.08m (39.6ft) overall with a beam of 3.82m, compared to the 1982 Westerly Konsort at 9.50m (31.2ft) with a 3.10m beam. The 2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40 is 2.58m longer than the 1982 Westerly Konsort. The 2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40 displaces approximately 103% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.89 and 73.0 m² of sail area. The 1982 Westerly Konsort, with an SA/D of 12.61 and 34.0 m² of canvas, offers modest sail power for its displacement. The 2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 19.9) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.73). The 1982 Westerly Konsort has a comfort ratio of 22.8 and a capsize screening value of 0.75. The ballast ratios are 38.0% for the 2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40 and 36.0% for the 1982 Westerly Konsort, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 380L of water capacity and 200L of fuel. The 1982 Westerly Konsort offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L water and 68L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1982 Westerly Konsort is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40 · 1982 Westerly Konsort