1999 Catalina 400 vs 2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40 — Comparison

1999 Catalina 4001999 Catalina 400
VS
2010 Hallberg-Rassy 402010 Hallberg-Rassy 40

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1999 Catalina 4002010 Hallberg-Rassy 40
General
ManufacturerCatalinaHallberg-Rassy
Year1999–20062010–2017
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSASweden
DesignerGerry DouglasGerman Frers
Dimensions
LOA12.12 m (39.8 ft)12.08 m (39.6 ft)
LWL10.36 m (34.0 ft)10.40 m (34.1 ft)
Beam3.86 m (12.7 ft)3.82 m (12.5 ft)
Draft1.98 m (6.5 ft)1.95 m (6.4 ft)
Weight
Displacement8,845 kg (19,500 lbs)9,200 kg (20,283 lbs)
Ballast3,629 kg (8,001 lbs)3,500 kg (7,716 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area66.9 m² (720 ft²)73.0 m² (786 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine40 HP55 HP
Fuel Capacity151 L (39.9 gal)200 L (52.8 gal)
Water Capacity303 L (80.0 gal)380 L (100.4 gal)
Accommodation
Berths86
Cabins32

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1999 Catalina 400
15.89
2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40
16.89
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1999 Catalina 400
41.03
2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40
38.04
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1999 Catalina 400
0.75
2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40
0.73
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1999 Catalina 400
18.97
2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40
19.94

Detailed Comparison

The 1999 Catalina 400 and 2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1999 Catalina 400 is a 1990s design by Catalina from USA, while the 2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40 is a modern offering from Hallberg-Rassy from Sweden. The 1999 Catalina 400 was penned by Gerry Douglas. The 2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40 was designed by German Frers.

In terms of size, the 1999 Catalina 400 measures 12.12m (39.8ft) overall with a beam of 3.86m, compared to the 2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40 at 12.08m (39.6ft) with a 3.82m beam. The 1999 Catalina 400 is 0.04m longer than the 2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40. The 2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40 displaces approximately 4% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1999 Catalina 400 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 15.89 and 66.9 m² of sail area. The 2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40, with an SA/D of 16.89 and 73.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1999 Catalina 400 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 19.0) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.75). The 2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40 has a comfort ratio of 19.9 and a capsize screening value of 0.73. The ballast ratios are 41.0% for the 1999 Catalina 400 and 38.0% for the 2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1999 Catalina 400 provides 8 berths in 3 cabins with 303L of water capacity and 151L of fuel. The 2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 380L water and 200L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1999 Catalina 400 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1999 Catalina 400 · 2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40