2000 Sabre 386 vs 1986 Westerly Oceanlord — Comparison

2000 Sabre 386
VS
1986 Westerly Oceanlord

Specifications Side by Side

Specification2000 Sabre 3861986 Westerly Oceanlord
General
ManufacturerSabreWesterly
Year2000–20071986–1992
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAUK
DesignerJim TaylorEd Dubois
Dimensions
LOA11.58 m (38.0 ft)12.04 m (39.5 ft)
LWL9.75 m (32.0 ft)9.75 m (32.0 ft)
Beam3.56 m (11.7 ft)3.81 m (12.5 ft)
Draft1.75 m (5.7 ft)1.83 m (6.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement7,257 kg (15,999 lbs)9,980 kg (22,002 lbs)
Ballast2,948 kg (6,499 lbs)3,629 kg (8,001 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area60.5 m² (651 ft²)68.0 m² (732 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine35 HP50 HP
Fuel Capacity114 L (30.1 gal)182 L (48.1 gal)
Water Capacity189 L (49.9 gal)340 L (89.8 gal)
Accommodation
Berths77
Cabins23

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
2000 Sabre 386
16.40
1986 Westerly Oceanlord
14.90
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
2000 Sabre 386
40.62
1986 Westerly Oceanlord
36.36
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
2000 Sabre 386
0.74
1986 Westerly Oceanlord
0.71
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
2000 Sabre 386
19.37
1986 Westerly Oceanlord
23.70

Detailed Comparison

The 2000 Sabre 386 and 1986 Westerly Oceanlord represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 2000 Sabre 386 is a 2000s design by Sabre from USA, while the 1986 Westerly Oceanlord is a 1980s offering from Westerly from UK. The 2000 Sabre 386 was penned by Jim Taylor. The 1986 Westerly Oceanlord was designed by Ed Dubois.

In terms of size, the 2000 Sabre 386 measures 11.58m (38.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.56m, compared to the 1986 Westerly Oceanlord at 12.04m (39.5ft) with a 3.81m beam. The 1986 Westerly Oceanlord is 0.46m longer than the 2000 Sabre 386. The 1986 Westerly Oceanlord displaces approximately 38% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 2000 Sabre 386 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.40 and 60.5 m² of sail area. The 1986 Westerly Oceanlord, with an SA/D of 14.90 and 68.0 m² of canvas, offers modest sail power for its displacement. The 2000 Sabre 386 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 2000 Sabre 386 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 19.4) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.74). The 1986 Westerly Oceanlord has a comfort ratio of 23.7 and a capsize screening value of 0.71. The ballast ratios are 40.6% for the 2000 Sabre 386 and 36.4% for the 1986 Westerly Oceanlord, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 2000 Sabre 386 provides 7 berths in 2 cabins with 189L of water capacity and 114L of fuel. The 1986 Westerly Oceanlord offers 7 berths in 3 cabins with 340L water and 182L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1986 Westerly Oceanlord is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2000 Sabre 386 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 2000 Sabre 386 · 1986 Westerly Oceanlord