Hunter 380 vs 1977 Cal 33 — Comparison

Hunter 380Hunter 380
VS
1977 Cal 33

Specifications Side by Side

SpecificationHunter 3801977 Cal 33
General
ManufacturerHunterCal
Year2001–20051977–1982
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAUSA
DesignerGlenn HendersonBill Lapworth / C. Raymond Hunt
Dimensions
LOA11.58 m (38.0 ft)10.06 m (33.0 ft)
LWL10.06 m (33.0 ft)8.08 m (26.5 ft)
Beam3.76 m (12.3 ft)3.20 m (10.5 ft)
Draft1.83 m (6.0 ft)1.60 m (5.2 ft)
Weight
Displacement7,257 kg (15,999 lbs)5,216 kg (11,499 lbs)
Ballast2,722 kg (6,001 lbs)2,177 kg (4,799 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area64.0 m² (689 ft²)43.0 m² (463 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine35 HP18 HP
Fuel Capacity114 L (30.1 gal)68 L (18.0 gal)
Water Capacity227 L (60.0 gal)114 L (30.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths76
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
Hunter 380
17.35
1977 Cal 33
14.53
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
Hunter 380
37.51
1977 Cal 33
41.74
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
Hunter 380
0.78
1977 Cal 33
0.74
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
Hunter 380
17.27
1977 Cal 33
22.63

Detailed Comparison

The Hunter 380 and 1977 Cal 33 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The Hunter 380 is a 2000s design by Hunter from USA, while the 1977 Cal 33 is a 1970s offering from Cal from USA. The Hunter 380 was penned by Glenn Henderson. The 1977 Cal 33 was designed by Bill Lapworth / C. Raymond Hunt.

In terms of size, the Hunter 380 measures 11.58m (38.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.76m, compared to the 1977 Cal 33 at 10.06m (33.0ft) with a 3.20m beam. The Hunter 380 is 1.52m longer than the 1977 Cal 33. The Hunter 380 displaces approximately 39% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the Hunter 380 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.35 and 64.0 m² of sail area. The 1977 Cal 33, with an SA/D of 14.53 and 43.0 m² of canvas, offers modest sail power for its displacement. The Hunter 380 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the Hunter 380 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 17.3) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.78). The 1977 Cal 33 has a comfort ratio of 22.6 and a capsize screening value of 0.74. The ballast ratios are 37.5% for the Hunter 380 and 41.7% for the 1977 Cal 33, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the Hunter 380 provides 7 berths in 2 cabins with 227L of water capacity and 114L of fuel. The 1977 Cal 33 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L water and 68L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1977 Cal 33 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Hunter 380 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The Hunter 380 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: Hunter 380 · 1977 Cal 33