2002 Hallberg-Rassy 46 vs 2000 Sabre 386 — Comparison

2002 Hallberg-Rassy 462002 Hallberg-Rassy 46
VS
2000 Sabre 386

Specifications Side by Side

Specification2002 Hallberg-Rassy 462000 Sabre 386
General
ManufacturerHallberg-RassySabre
Year2002–20122000–2007
TypeSloopSloop
CountrySwedenUSA
DesignerGerman FrersJim Taylor
Dimensions
LOA14.05 m (46.1 ft)11.58 m (38.0 ft)
LWL11.70 m (38.4 ft)9.75 m (32.0 ft)
Beam4.20 m (13.8 ft)3.56 m (11.7 ft)
Draft2.10 m (6.9 ft)1.75 m (5.7 ft)
Weight
Displacement13,000 kg (28,660 lbs)7,257 kg (15,999 lbs)
Ballast5,000 kg (11,023 lbs)2,948 kg (6,499 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area91.0 m² (980 ft²)60.5 m² (651 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine75 HP35 HP
Fuel Capacity300 L (79.3 gal)114 L (30.1 gal)
Water Capacity600 L (158.5 gal)189 L (49.9 gal)
Accommodation
Berths77
Cabins32

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
2002 Hallberg-Rassy 46
16.72
2000 Sabre 386
16.40
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
2002 Hallberg-Rassy 46
38.46
2000 Sabre 386
40.62
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
2002 Hallberg-Rassy 46
0.72
2000 Sabre 386
0.74
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
2002 Hallberg-Rassy 46
19.19
2000 Sabre 386
19.37

Detailed Comparison

The 2002 Hallberg-Rassy 46 and 2000 Sabre 386 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 2002 Hallberg-Rassy 46 is a 2000s design by Hallberg-Rassy from Sweden, while the 2000 Sabre 386 is a 2000s offering from Sabre from USA. The 2002 Hallberg-Rassy 46 was penned by German Frers. The 2000 Sabre 386 was designed by Jim Taylor.

In terms of size, the 2002 Hallberg-Rassy 46 measures 14.05m (46.1ft) overall with a beam of 4.20m, compared to the 2000 Sabre 386 at 11.58m (38.0ft) with a 3.56m beam. The 2002 Hallberg-Rassy 46 is 2.47m longer than the 2000 Sabre 386. The 2002 Hallberg-Rassy 46 displaces approximately 79% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 2002 Hallberg-Rassy 46 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.72 and 91.0 m² of sail area. The 2000 Sabre 386, with an SA/D of 16.40 and 60.5 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 2002 Hallberg-Rassy 46 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 2002 Hallberg-Rassy 46 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 19.2) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.72). The 2000 Sabre 386 has a comfort ratio of 19.4 and a capsize screening value of 0.74. The ballast ratios are 38.5% for the 2002 Hallberg-Rassy 46 and 40.6% for the 2000 Sabre 386, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 2002 Hallberg-Rassy 46 provides 7 berths in 3 cabins with 600L of water capacity and 300L of fuel. The 2000 Sabre 386 offers 7 berths in 2 cabins with 189L water and 114L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 2000 Sabre 386 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2002 Hallberg-Rassy 46 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 2002 Hallberg-Rassy 46 · 2000 Sabre 386