2004 Bavaria 38 vs 1982 Westerly Konsort — Comparison

2004 Bavaria 38
VS
1982 Westerly Konsort1982 Westerly Konsort

Specifications Side by Side

Specification2004 Bavaria 381982 Westerly Konsort
General
ManufacturerBavariaWesterly
Year2004–20091982–1990
TypeSloopSloop
CountryGermanyUK
DesignerJ&J DesignEd Dubois
Dimensions
LOA11.72 m (38.5 ft)9.50 m (31.2 ft)
LWL10.40 m (34.1 ft)7.70 m (25.3 ft)
Beam3.76 m (12.3 ft)3.10 m (10.2 ft)
Draft1.85 m (6.1 ft)1.07 m (3.5 ft)
Weight
Displacement7,500 kg (16,535 lbs)4,536 kg (10,000 lbs)
Ballast2,500 kg (5,512 lbs)1,633 kg (3,600 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area63.0 m² (678 ft²)34.0 m² (366 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinBilge
Engine & Tanks
Engine30 HP15 HP
Fuel Capacity100 L (26.4 gal)68 L (18.0 gal)
Water Capacity200 L (52.8 gal)114 L (30.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths86
Cabins32

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
2004 Bavaria 38
16.70
1982 Westerly Konsort
12.61
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
2004 Bavaria 38
33.33
1982 Westerly Konsort
36.00
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
2004 Bavaria 38
0.77
1982 Westerly Konsort
0.75
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
2004 Bavaria 38
16.94
1982 Westerly Konsort
22.75

Detailed Comparison

The 2004 Bavaria 38 and 1982 Westerly Konsort represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 2004 Bavaria 38 is a 2000s design by Bavaria from Germany, while the 1982 Westerly Konsort is a 1980s offering from Westerly from UK. The 2004 Bavaria 38 was penned by J&J Design. The 1982 Westerly Konsort was designed by Ed Dubois.

In terms of size, the 2004 Bavaria 38 measures 11.72m (38.5ft) overall with a beam of 3.76m, compared to the 1982 Westerly Konsort at 9.50m (31.2ft) with a 3.10m beam. The 2004 Bavaria 38 is 2.22m longer than the 1982 Westerly Konsort. The 2004 Bavaria 38 displaces approximately 65% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 2004 Bavaria 38 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.70 and 63.0 m² of sail area. The 1982 Westerly Konsort, with an SA/D of 12.61 and 34.0 m² of canvas, offers modest sail power for its displacement. The 2004 Bavaria 38 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 2004 Bavaria 38 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 16.9) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.77). The 1982 Westerly Konsort has a comfort ratio of 22.8 and a capsize screening value of 0.75. The ballast ratios are 33.3% for the 2004 Bavaria 38 and 36.0% for the 1982 Westerly Konsort, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 2004 Bavaria 38 provides 8 berths in 3 cabins with 200L of water capacity and 100L of fuel. The 1982 Westerly Konsort offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L water and 68L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1982 Westerly Konsort is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2004 Bavaria 38 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 2004 Bavaria 38 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 2004 Bavaria 38 · 1982 Westerly Konsort